228 History View and True Facts─Conclusion of Negative and Positive View
Date Issued
2015
Date
2015
Author(s)
Hou, Han-Ting
Abstract
This paper discusses the 228 Incident, and the responsibility of both the Chief Executive Office of the President of the State.And collecting the 228 Incident of opinion with supporters and opponents to organize.The Chief Executive Office did not authoritarian,and the President of the State, Chen Yi did not marginalized politically Taiwan people,Inflation prompted by Japan''s colonial and War, Chen Yi tried to combat corruption.However, the implementation of local self-government, and the implementation of the election, all kinds of deregulation, resulting in a decline and political opportunities for advocacy riots. Chen Yi is the kindness to the people of Taiwan to mobilize the army, they gave advocated riots opportunity.Chiang Kai-shek at the time the information received mostly rebels rebellion, so sent troops to Taiwan to suppress the rebels.Taiwan''s petition and not send troops telegram was received after the troops are, and repeatedly ordered their ""No Retaliation"" is also reflected in its care for the people of Taiwan. Currently no evidence that Chiang Kai-shek ""massacre"" Taiwan people, temporarily veto the dismissal of Chen Yi only condition is otherwise arranged.In this paper, from the political responsibility and administrative responsibility to prove, on the 228 Incident, Chiang Kai-shek not be responsible. In this paper, organize the 228 Incident, the government, the KMT, the DPP''s exposition.The 228 Incident and rarely related to independence, so the DPP and Taiwan independence linked to the 228 Incident is not correct.In addition, the paper simply through quantitative analysis confirmed the DPP speculation the 228 Incident for political interests.The DPP to discuss the 228 incident in recent decades become the mainstream public opinion in Taiwan, the KMT also echoed consider the 228 incident is forcing people to rebel. This paper points out that a failure of the KMT''s policy, while Guo Guanying articles reasoning is correct, had the opportunity to make the incident was the Government''s views reintegration public discussion, but Guo Guanying writing odd risk, not only lost the flip the 228 Incident discussed opportunities as well,but also let Guo was paid a painful price.
Subjects
228 Incident, Chen Yi
Chiang Kai-shek
DPP
Taiwan independence
SDGs
Type
thesis
File(s)![Thumbnail Image]()
Loading...
Name
ntu-104-R01322028-1.pdf
Size
23.54 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum
(MD5):f2164a85e23406f69b8b49e91713594e