清代學者《春秋》與三《傳》復仇觀的省察與詮釋
Resource
臺大文史哲學報, n.77 p.1-41
Journal
臺大文史哲學報
Journal Volume
無
Journal Issue
77
Pages
1-41
Date Issued
2012
Author(s)
Abstract
Among the three Commentaries of the ”Chunqiu (Spring and Autumn Annals)”, the ”Gongyang zhuan” espouses the most extreme view on the idea of revenge. The ”Gongyang zhuan”'s attitude toward revenge is most salient in the fourth year of Duke Zhuang, when ”The Marquis of Ji made a great departure from his state,” an incident that involves the issue of responsibility that falls upon descendant sons and ministers to exact revenge on behalf of a past ruler even after nine/a hundred generations after his murder. This essay first discusses early Qing scholars' opposition to ”the revenge of nine generations,” then late Qing scholars' support of the idea. The rationales of the latter, as the essay points out, were not unassailable. None of the supporters was able to formulate an adequate response to the argument that the enactment of inter-state revenge violates the idea of ”absolute reverence for the king.” The challenge, and even the destruction, that the practice of ”revenge” would bring to the legal framework of the state, as well as the resolution to this conflict has always been a matter of tension between ritualism and legalism. Therefore, had the ”Chunqiu” truly glorified ”revenge,” it would surely have conflicted with the idea of ”absolute reverence for the king.” The present study argues that ”Chunqiu” does not endorse this practice, and that it is the ”Gongyang” tradition that has developed its own line of thinking to validate the practice.
SDGs
Type
journal article
File(s)![Thumbnail Image]()
Loading...
Name
清代學者《春秋》與三《傳》復仇觀的省察與詮釋.pdf
Size
1.18 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum
(MD5):64e31565d5715a69509e90b352884665