Repository logo
  • English
  • 中文
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. College of Medicine / 醫學院
  3. School of Medicine / 醫學系
  4. Proton pump inhibitor versus prokinetic therapy in patients with functional dyspepsia: Is therapeutic response predicted by Rome III subgroups?
 
  • Details

Proton pump inhibitor versus prokinetic therapy in patients with functional dyspepsia: Is therapeutic response predicted by Rome III subgroups?

Journal
Journal of Gastroenterology
Journal Volume
46
Journal Issue
2
Pages
183-190
Date Issued
2011
Author(s)
Hsu Y.-C.
JYH-MING LIOU  
Yang T.-H.
Hsu W.-L.
Lin H.-J.
Wu H.-T.
Lin J.-T.
HSIU-PO WANG  
MING-SHIANG WU  
DOI
10.1007/s00535-010-0334-1
URI
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-79954442464&doi=10.1007%2fs00535-010-0334-1&partnerID=40&md5=ee4514ad28801ce31f54126e88d65d3a
https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/541045
Abstract
Background: The comparative effectiveness of proton pump inhibitor versus prokinetic therapy in relieving the symptoms of patients with functional dyspepsia remains unknown. Whether the Rome III subgroups predict therapeutic response has not been investigated. Methods: This was an open-label, parallel randomized controlled trial. A total of 329 adult outpatients fulfilling the Rome III criteria for functional dyspepsia were randomly allocated to receive either lansoprazole 30 mg once daily (n = 166) or mosapride 5 mg thrice daily (n = 163) for 2 weeks. Enrolled patients were evaluated with the validated Hong Kong Index questionnaire for symptom severity at baseline and at the end of the trial. The primary outcome was symptom relief as defined by the Hong Kong Index, and the secondary outcome was decrease of symptom scores. Post-hoc multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify independent predictors for therapeutic response. Results: After 2-week therapy, 50.6% (84/166) and 47.85% (78/163) of the patients treated with lansoprazole and mosapride, respectively, achieved significant symptom relief (odds ratio 1.12, 95% confidence interval 0.72-1.72, p = 0.62). Differences in decreases of symptom scores between lansoprazole and mosapride receivers were also insignificant (-0.08, 95% confidence interval -1.25 to 1.09, p = 0.89). Therapeutic responses to either pharmacotherapy did not differ in the subgroup of patients fulfilling the criteria for epigastric pain syndrome (n = 256) or in those fulfilling the criteria for postprandial distress syndrome (n = 161). Multivariate logistic regression confirmed that the treatment allocation and Rome III subgroup were unrelated to treatment outcome. Conclusions: The effectiveness of proton pump inhibitor therapy and that of prokinetic therapy in functional dyspepsia are not different, and cannot be predicted by Rome III subgroups. ? 2010 Springer.
SDGs

[SDGs]SDG3

Other Subjects
lansoprazole; mosapride; prokinetic agent; unclassified drug; adult; article; comparative effectiveness; controlled study; disease classification; disease severity; drug efficacy; drug response; dyspepsia; epigastric pain; female; functional dyspepsia; gastrointestinal symptom; Hong Kong Index; human; major clinical study; male; morning dosage; open study; outcome assessment; outpatient; parallel design; postprandial distress syndrome; priority journal; questionnaire; randomized controlled trial; symptom; treatment duration; treatment outcome; unspecified side effect; 2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles; Abdominal Pain; Adult; Anti-Ulcer Agents; Benzamides; Dyspepsia; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morpholines; Multivariate Analysis; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Regression Analysis; Serotonin Receptor Agonists; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome
Type
journal article

臺大位居世界頂尖大學之列,為永久珍藏及向國際展現本校豐碩的研究成果及學術能量,圖書館整合機構典藏(NTUR)與學術庫(AH)不同功能平台,成為臺大學術典藏NTU scholars。期能整合研究能量、促進交流合作、保存學術產出、推廣研究成果。

To permanently archive and promote researcher profiles and scholarly works, Library integrates the services of “NTU Repository” with “Academic Hub” to form NTU Scholars.

總館學科館員 (Main Library)
醫學圖書館學科館員 (Medical Library)
社會科學院辜振甫紀念圖書館學科館員 (Social Sciences Library)

開放取用是從使用者角度提升資訊取用性的社會運動,應用在學術研究上是透過將研究著作公開供使用者自由取閱,以促進學術傳播及因應期刊訂購費用逐年攀升。同時可加速研究發展、提升研究影響力,NTU Scholars即為本校的開放取用典藏(OA Archive)平台。(點選深入了解OA)

  • 請確認所上傳的全文是原創的內容,若該文件包含部分內容的版權非匯入者所有,或由第三方贊助與合作完成,請確認該版權所有者及第三方同意提供此授權。
    Please represent that the submission is your original work, and that you have the right to grant the rights to upload.
  • 若欲上傳已出版的全文電子檔,可使用Open policy finder網站查詢,以確認出版單位之版權政策。
    Please use Open policy finder to find a summary of permissions that are normally given as part of each publisher's copyright transfer agreement.
  • 網站簡介 (Quickstart Guide)
  • 使用手冊 (Instruction Manual)
  • 線上預約服務 (Booking Service)
  • 方案一:臺灣大學計算機中心帳號登入
    (With C&INC Email Account)
  • 方案二:ORCID帳號登入 (With ORCID)
  • 方案一:定期更新ORCID者,以ID匯入 (Search for identifier (ORCID))
  • 方案二:自行建檔 (Default mode Submission)
  • 方案三:學科館員協助匯入 (Email worklist to subject librarians)

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science