An experimental study on the rocking response of bridge piers with spread footing foundations
Resource
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 40(7), 749-769
Journal
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Pages
749-769
Date Issued
2011
Date
2011
Author(s)
Abstract
Abstract Some spread footing foundations from real retrofitting practices in Taiwan were extended to be uneconomically large due to the restriction of foundation uplift regulated in the design code. Although rocking mode of spread footings induced from foundation uplift is not favorable in current design code, recent studies have shown that the rocking of a spread footing may have a beneficial effect on the dynamic performance of piers by reducing the earthquake forces that can be transmitted to the pier base. This implies that the plastic deformation that occurs at the pier's plastic zone can be decreased and as a result the ductility demand of piers can possibly be reduced. In order to gain a better understanding of the structural behavior related to rocking and to clarify that if the widening and strengthening of the foundations to limit the rocking mechanism of spread footing is necessary for the retrofitting work, a series of preliminary rocking experiments were performed. A total of three circular reinforced concrete columns with spread footing foundations were tested. Using pseudo‐dynamic tests and a cyclic loading test, these columns were subjected to different levels of earthquake accelerations, including a near field ground motion. The results of the tests and the rocking behavior of the footings are discussed in this paper. From the benchmark test, the difference between the response behavior of a rocking base and a fixed base foundation was highlighted. By comparing the experimental responses of the retrofitted column with the responses of the original one, the effect of the rocking mechanism on the ductility demand and strength demand of the columns was also identified. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
SDGs
Type
journal article
File(s)![Thumbnail Image]()
Loading...
Name
130.pdf
Size
23.2 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum
(MD5):be61f0a85314e36ead5509d996e72774