Repository logo
  • English
  • 中文
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. College of Medicine / 醫學院
  3. School of Medicine / 醫學系
  4. Hand-assisted versus total laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy
 
  • Details

Hand-assisted versus total laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy

Journal
Journal of the Formosan Medical Association
Journal Volume
103
Journal Issue
10
Pages
749-753
Date Issued
2004
Author(s)
I-RUE LAI  
MENG-KUN TSAI  
PO-HUANG LEE  
URI
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-11344281294&partnerID=40&md5=190a95707798612b69268000785c2c20
https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/521475
Abstract
Background and Purpose: The optimal minimally invasive procedure to procure live donor kidneys for renal transplantation has not been established. This study compared the donor outcome of hand-assisted laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy (H-LLDN) with total laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy (T-LLDN). Methods: The outcomes of 12 donors undergoing H-LLDN were compared to that of a subsequent series of 12 donors undergoing T-LLDN. Body mass index, operation time, warm ischemia time, hospital stay, surgical complications, and short-term graft function were compared between the 2 groups. Results: LLDN was successfully performed in all 24 donors. Both approaches resulted in excellent early graft function. The mean operation time in T-LLDN (215 minutes) was slightly shorter than that in H-LLDN (258 minutes), suggesting that the skills developed as surgeons learned the H-LLDN procedure had transferred to their performance of T-LLDN. The mean warm ischemia time of the T-LLDN group (4.5 minutes) was longer than that of the H-LLDN group (3.8 minutes), although this difference was not significant. One minor tear of the lumbar vein occurred in the H-LLDN group and the resultant bleeding necessitated blood transfusion. One mechanical failure occurred when the renal vein was divided by endoscopic gastrointestinal anastomosis in the T-LLDN group. The length of hospital stay, resumption of diet, and the use of narcotic analgesics were not different between the 2 groups. Conclusions: Both H-LLDN and T-LLDN are safe and effective approaches for the procurement of live donor kidneys. The benefits of the H-LLDN technique include direct manual control of the operative field and increased safety margin. The development of a hospital LLDN program by starting with a hand-assisted approach may reduce the potential bleeding complications and facilitate the safe transition to the cosmetically preferable total laparoscopic approach.
SDGs

[SDGs]SDG3

Other Subjects
narcotic analgesic agent; pethidine; adult; anastomosis; article; bleeding; blood transfusion; body mass; clinical article; clinical trial; controlled clinical trial; controlled study; diet; drug use; endoscopic surgery; esthetics; feasibility study; female; gastrointestinal surgery; health program; hospitalization; human; intermethod comparison; ischemia; kidney donor; kidney function; kidney vein; laparoscopic surgery; learning; living donor; lumbar spine; male; nephrectomy; operation duration; outcomes research; postoperative complication; prospective study; safety; skill; surgical approach; surgical equipment; surgical technique; treatment outcome; vein injury; Adult; Female; Humans; Kidney Transplantation; Laparoscopy; Living Donors; Male; Middle Aged; Nephrectomy; Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Type
journal article

臺大位居世界頂尖大學之列,為永久珍藏及向國際展現本校豐碩的研究成果及學術能量,圖書館整合機構典藏(NTUR)與學術庫(AH)不同功能平台,成為臺大學術典藏NTU scholars。期能整合研究能量、促進交流合作、保存學術產出、推廣研究成果。

To permanently archive and promote researcher profiles and scholarly works, Library integrates the services of “NTU Repository” with “Academic Hub” to form NTU Scholars.

總館學科館員 (Main Library)
醫學圖書館學科館員 (Medical Library)
社會科學院辜振甫紀念圖書館學科館員 (Social Sciences Library)

開放取用是從使用者角度提升資訊取用性的社會運動,應用在學術研究上是透過將研究著作公開供使用者自由取閱,以促進學術傳播及因應期刊訂購費用逐年攀升。同時可加速研究發展、提升研究影響力,NTU Scholars即為本校的開放取用典藏(OA Archive)平台。(點選深入了解OA)

  • 請確認所上傳的全文是原創的內容,若該文件包含部分內容的版權非匯入者所有,或由第三方贊助與合作完成,請確認該版權所有者及第三方同意提供此授權。
    Please represent that the submission is your original work, and that you have the right to grant the rights to upload.
  • 若欲上傳已出版的全文電子檔,可使用Open policy finder網站查詢,以確認出版單位之版權政策。
    Please use Open policy finder to find a summary of permissions that are normally given as part of each publisher's copyright transfer agreement.
  • 網站簡介 (Quickstart Guide)
  • 使用手冊 (Instruction Manual)
  • 線上預約服務 (Booking Service)
  • 方案一:臺灣大學計算機中心帳號登入
    (With C&INC Email Account)
  • 方案二:ORCID帳號登入 (With ORCID)
  • 方案一:定期更新ORCID者,以ID匯入 (Search for identifier (ORCID))
  • 方案二:自行建檔 (Default mode Submission)
  • 方案三:學科館員協助匯入 (Email worklist to subject librarians)

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science