Repository logo
  • English
  • 中文
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. College of Medicine / 醫學院
  3. Medical Education and Bioethics / 醫學教育暨生醫倫理研究所
  4. Perspectives of Transplant Professionals on the Values, Ethics, and Challenges of Living Kidney Donor Evaluation in Asia
 
  • Details

Perspectives of Transplant Professionals on the Values, Ethics, and Challenges of Living Kidney Donor Evaluation in Asia

Journal
Transplantation
Journal Volume
99
Journal Issue
7
Pages
1386-1395
Date Issued
2015
Author(s)
Tong A.
Chapman J.R.
Kee T.
Li P.K.T.
DANIEL FU-CHANG TSAI  
Wong G.
Craig J.C.
DOI
10.1097/TP.0000000000000534
URI
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84940643726&doi=10.1097%2fTP.0000000000000534&partnerID=40&md5=b15da86e4d5dd96677ecc5c529f0cd19
https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/464910
Abstract
Deceased donor rates in Asia are among the lowest in the world. This has necessitated a reliance on living kidney donation, which has given rise to concerns about donor motivation and assessment in this region. We aimed to describe transplant professional perspectives on living kidney donor evaluation in Asia. Methods Face-to-face, semistructured interviews were conducted with 53 transplant professionals (nephrologists [n = 21], surgeons/urologists [n = 17], coordinators [n = 7], social workers [n = 5], ethicists [n = 2], psychologist [n = 1]) from 20 centers in 10 countries. Transcripts were analyzed thematically to identify themes. Results The theme of traversing vulnerability overarched 4 themes. Vigilance against exploitation of the vulnerable meant mitigating the threat of commercial transplantation, combating disparities, and verifying volunteerism. Maintaining clarity of professional roles encompassed the perceived necessity of legal safeguards to determine legitimacy of relationships, ensuring informed consent, demarcating responsibilities, minimizing conflict of interest, meeting community expectations, and resolving ambivalence regarding donor risk. Societal plight driving caution about living kidney donor assessment was emphasized in the context of poverty and desperation, higher risk of disease, and lack of social security. Navigating sociocultural barriers acknowledged the centrality of the family, economic priorities, distrust in modern medicine, generational traditions, and emotional opacity limiting their ability to gauge donor motivation. Conclusions Moral, professional, sociocultural and societal vulnerabilities contribute to the barriers and ethical quandaries in living kidney donation in Asia. Strategies are needed to address culturally based anxieties and disparities in living donation. Transplant professionals depend on strong legislation and policies to prevent exploitation of living donors. Copyright ? 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
SDGs

[SDGs]SDG3

Other Subjects
adult; aged; Article; clinical practice; controlled study; female; health care policy; health disparity; health education; human; kidney donor; legal aspect; living donor; major clinical study; male; medical ethics; medical service; medical society; middle aged; patient safety; physician attitude; priority journal; professional knowledge; professional standard; risk assessment; risk factor; social aspect; social class; social interaction; social psychology; social security; volunteer; young adult; adverse effects; Asia; attitude to health; clinical trial; cognition; cultural factor; donor selection; ethics; health care disparity; health care personnel; health personnel attitude; informed consent; interview; kidney transplantation; legislation and jurisprudence; multicenter study; perception; psychology; qualitative research; social behavior; socioeconomics; supply and distribution; vulnerable population; Adult; Aged; Asia; Attitude of Health Personnel; Cultural Characteristics; Donor Selection; Female; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; Health Personnel; Healthcare Disparities; Humans; Informed Consent; Interviews as Topic; Kidney Transplantation; Living Donors; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Safety; Perception; Professional Role; Qualitative Research; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Social Responsibility; Socioeconomic Factors; Volition; Vulnerable Populations; Young Adult
Publisher
Lippincott Williams and Wilkins
Type
journal article

臺大位居世界頂尖大學之列,為永久珍藏及向國際展現本校豐碩的研究成果及學術能量,圖書館整合機構典藏(NTUR)與學術庫(AH)不同功能平台,成為臺大學術典藏NTU scholars。期能整合研究能量、促進交流合作、保存學術產出、推廣研究成果。

To permanently archive and promote researcher profiles and scholarly works, Library integrates the services of “NTU Repository” with “Academic Hub” to form NTU Scholars.

總館學科館員 (Main Library)
醫學圖書館學科館員 (Medical Library)
社會科學院辜振甫紀念圖書館學科館員 (Social Sciences Library)

開放取用是從使用者角度提升資訊取用性的社會運動,應用在學術研究上是透過將研究著作公開供使用者自由取閱,以促進學術傳播及因應期刊訂購費用逐年攀升。同時可加速研究發展、提升研究影響力,NTU Scholars即為本校的開放取用典藏(OA Archive)平台。(點選深入了解OA)

  • 請確認所上傳的全文是原創的內容,若該文件包含部分內容的版權非匯入者所有,或由第三方贊助與合作完成,請確認該版權所有者及第三方同意提供此授權。
    Please represent that the submission is your original work, and that you have the right to grant the rights to upload.
  • 若欲上傳已出版的全文電子檔,可使用Open policy finder網站查詢,以確認出版單位之版權政策。
    Please use Open policy finder to find a summary of permissions that are normally given as part of each publisher's copyright transfer agreement.
  • 網站簡介 (Quickstart Guide)
  • 使用手冊 (Instruction Manual)
  • 線上預約服務 (Booking Service)
  • 方案一:臺灣大學計算機中心帳號登入
    (With C&INC Email Account)
  • 方案二:ORCID帳號登入 (With ORCID)
  • 方案一:定期更新ORCID者,以ID匯入 (Search for identifier (ORCID))
  • 方案二:自行建檔 (Default mode Submission)
  • 方案三:學科館員協助匯入 (Email worklist to subject librarians)

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science