Repository logo
  • English
  • 中文
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. College of Law / 法律學院
  3. Law / 法律學系
  4. 美國違憲審查的審查標準
 
  • Details

美國違憲審查的審查標準

Date Issued
2002
Date
2002
Author(s)
黃昭元
DOI
902414H002017
URI
http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw//handle/246246/12825
Abstract
The issue of choosing an appropriate standard of review has been central to the judicial review, particularly in practice. In theory, there are two different methodologies to approach this issue: the U.S. courts tend to adopt the approach of “bottom-up ” categorization in deciding the standards of review, while the German courts have been used to a “top-down,” balancing test of “proportionality principle.” This project chooses the following three types of constitutional rights, freedom of speech, right to equal protection and political rights, and analyze their standards of review as decided by the U.S. Supreme Court. The research finds that the U.S. Supreme Court has applied the O ’Brien Test to review the constitutionality of the “content-neutral ” restrictions. However, this research suggests that further categorization based might be worth of consideration for more predictable standards. Regarding the equal protection cases, the U.S. Supreme Court has recently developed a consistent position to apply the strict scrutiny test to the all racial discrimination cases, including the race-based affirmative action, while applying the intermediate scrutiny test to the gender discrimination cases. However, this research argues that the standard of review should be relaxed with respect to the race-based affirmative action. Finally, the research finds that the U.S. Supreme Court seems to change its standard from the previous strict scrutiny test to an ad hoc balancing test after the Anderson case of 1983. The research holds a different and critical view on such a change.
Subjects
Standards of Review
Equal
Protection
Affirmative Action
Racial Equality
Gender Equality
Freedom of Speech
Content-Neutral Restrictions
Political Rights
Restrictions on
Candidacy
SDGs

[SDGs]SDG5

[SDGs]SDG16

Publisher
臺北市:國立臺灣大學法律學系暨研究所
Type
report
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

902414H002017.pdf

Size

40.72 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum

(MD5):04739d2cca37a3b03a15c1d04edc3b22

臺大位居世界頂尖大學之列,為永久珍藏及向國際展現本校豐碩的研究成果及學術能量,圖書館整合機構典藏(NTUR)與學術庫(AH)不同功能平台,成為臺大學術典藏NTU scholars。期能整合研究能量、促進交流合作、保存學術產出、推廣研究成果。

To permanently archive and promote researcher profiles and scholarly works, Library integrates the services of “NTU Repository” with “Academic Hub” to form NTU Scholars.

總館學科館員 (Main Library)
醫學圖書館學科館員 (Medical Library)
社會科學院辜振甫紀念圖書館學科館員 (Social Sciences Library)

開放取用是從使用者角度提升資訊取用性的社會運動,應用在學術研究上是透過將研究著作公開供使用者自由取閱,以促進學術傳播及因應期刊訂購費用逐年攀升。同時可加速研究發展、提升研究影響力,NTU Scholars即為本校的開放取用典藏(OA Archive)平台。(點選深入了解OA)

  • 請確認所上傳的全文是原創的內容,若該文件包含部分內容的版權非匯入者所有,或由第三方贊助與合作完成,請確認該版權所有者及第三方同意提供此授權。
    Please represent that the submission is your original work, and that you have the right to grant the rights to upload.
  • 若欲上傳已出版的全文電子檔,可使用Open policy finder網站查詢,以確認出版單位之版權政策。
    Please use Open policy finder to find a summary of permissions that are normally given as part of each publisher's copyright transfer agreement.
  • 網站簡介 (Quickstart Guide)
  • 使用手冊 (Instruction Manual)
  • 線上預約服務 (Booking Service)
  • 方案一:臺灣大學計算機中心帳號登入
    (With C&INC Email Account)
  • 方案二:ORCID帳號登入 (With ORCID)
  • 方案一:定期更新ORCID者,以ID匯入 (Search for identifier (ORCID))
  • 方案二:自行建檔 (Default mode Submission)
  • 方案三:學科館員協助匯入 (Email worklist to subject librarians)

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science