Repository logo
  • English
  • 中文
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. College of Law / 法律學院
  3. Law / 法律學系
  4. From John H. Ely’s Representative Reinforcement Theory On the Dispute of Legitimacy of Judicial Review
 
  • Details

From John H. Ely’s Representative Reinforcement Theory On the Dispute of Legitimacy of Judicial Review

Date Issued
2007
Date
2007
Author(s)
Lee, Hsung-Han
DOI
zh-TW
URI
http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw//handle/246246/52439
Abstract
Because There are few discussions about the legitimacy of judicial review in Taiwan, we have a brief discussion about the dispute of legitimacy of judicial review in the U.S. academy at first, hoping that this could be helpful for Taiwanese academy to have deeper and more innovative discussions in one hand, and that this could be helpful to set a background of the representative reinforcement theory in the other hand. Therefore, having introduced professor John H. Ely’s representative reinforcement theory, we makes several responses to the dispute of legitimacy of judicial review. This article suggests because representative reinforcement theory holds that the court shouldn’t make substantial value determinations, and that it intervenes only when the political market is systematically malfunctioning, there are less tension between judiciary and democracy. Afterwards, this article also collects otheresearchers’ critiques on representative reinforcement theory. Based on these critiques, we hold that there are much more phenomenon of systematically malfunctioning of political market than Ely had identified. Therefore, we have no need to limit ourselves to exclusion from formal political participation and prejudice against discrete and insular minorities as the only phenomenon of systematically malfunctioning of political market. At the end of this article, we even apply the revised representative reinforcement theory to several important decisions about clearing the channels of political change and facilitating the representation of minorities, not only to reveal how representative reinforcement theory can be applied in concrete cases, but also to prove that representative reinforcement theory does give some innovative and different thinking for the practice of interpreting constitution in Taiwan.
Subjects
司法違憲審查
正當性
代表性補強理論
抗多數困境
系統性失靈
多元民主
孤立而隔絕的少數
Judicial Review
Legitimacy
Representative Reinforcement Theory
Counter-majoritarian Difficulty
Systematically Malfunctioning
Pluralism
Discrete and Insular Minorities
SDGs

[SDGs]SDG16

Type
thesis
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

ntu-96-R93a21016-1.pdf

Size

23.31 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum

(MD5):8604ce8672ad48186c8086a06c697189

臺大位居世界頂尖大學之列,為永久珍藏及向國際展現本校豐碩的研究成果及學術能量,圖書館整合機構典藏(NTUR)與學術庫(AH)不同功能平台,成為臺大學術典藏NTU scholars。期能整合研究能量、促進交流合作、保存學術產出、推廣研究成果。

To permanently archive and promote researcher profiles and scholarly works, Library integrates the services of “NTU Repository” with “Academic Hub” to form NTU Scholars.

總館學科館員 (Main Library)
醫學圖書館學科館員 (Medical Library)
社會科學院辜振甫紀念圖書館學科館員 (Social Sciences Library)

開放取用是從使用者角度提升資訊取用性的社會運動,應用在學術研究上是透過將研究著作公開供使用者自由取閱,以促進學術傳播及因應期刊訂購費用逐年攀升。同時可加速研究發展、提升研究影響力,NTU Scholars即為本校的開放取用典藏(OA Archive)平台。(點選深入了解OA)

  • 請確認所上傳的全文是原創的內容,若該文件包含部分內容的版權非匯入者所有,或由第三方贊助與合作完成,請確認該版權所有者及第三方同意提供此授權。
    Please represent that the submission is your original work, and that you have the right to grant the rights to upload.
  • 若欲上傳已出版的全文電子檔,可使用Open policy finder網站查詢,以確認出版單位之版權政策。
    Please use Open policy finder to find a summary of permissions that are normally given as part of each publisher's copyright transfer agreement.
  • 網站簡介 (Quickstart Guide)
  • 使用手冊 (Instruction Manual)
  • 線上預約服務 (Booking Service)
  • 方案一:臺灣大學計算機中心帳號登入
    (With C&INC Email Account)
  • 方案二:ORCID帳號登入 (With ORCID)
  • 方案一:定期更新ORCID者,以ID匯入 (Search for identifier (ORCID))
  • 方案二:自行建檔 (Default mode Submission)
  • 方案三:學科館員協助匯入 (Email worklist to subject librarians)

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science