https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/13866
Title: | 符號學與中世紀小學的關係(3/3) Reconstruction of the Disciplinary History of Semiotics |
Authors: | 張漢良 | Keywords: | 符號學;修辭;邏輯;論辯;語用學;歷史;semiotics;rhetoric;logic;controversy;pragmatics;history | Issue Date: | 31-Jul-1999 | Publisher: | 臺北市:國立臺灣大學外國語文學系暨研究所 | Abstract: | 本計畫探討先秦諸子著名的名實之 辯,以期建構中國符號學思想的早期歷史。 語言可有多種不同的使用方式及用途,當人 們察覺到語言運用上面的差異和衝突時,便 可產生泛符號概念的思辯。此思辯往往透過 言說之論戰戲劇性地展開,先秦的名實之辯 正是不同語言運用方式之間的傾軋。這場邏 輯與修辭的論辯,頗類似西方中古時期三語 文學門的衝突。吾人可從語用學的角度來檢 視這場名實之辯,參與的先秦諸子立論根據 並不一致,不但各執己見,甚至各說各話。 而更為複雜的是,其論述展開方式往往又與 其抨擊對方論點的立場自相矛盾。由此 之,先秦諸子的論戰正蘊含了當代符號學的觀關切議題。 This project explores the great controversy over language pragmatics in the Pre-Qin era, with the aim of constructing the early history of Chinese semiotics. Semiotic thinking in general can be born when people become aware of the discrepancy and tension among different uses of language. This awareness and its expression are often enacted dramatically in the controversy of discourse. The discursive polemics in Pre- Qin China centers around the contention of logic and rhetoric, quite similar to the fortune of the trivium in the medieval West. Traditionally known as the Great Debate on Name and Substance, the controversy should be understood as a phenomenon of language pragmatics. Those who participate in the Debate fail to communicate with one another because there is a discrepancy between encoding and decoding. Their polemics helps to create a textual space that includes the hidden agenda of semiotics. |
URI: | http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw//handle/246246/10069 | Other Identifiers: | 882411H002039 | Rights: | 國立臺灣大學外國語文學系暨研究所 |
Appears in Collections: | 外國語文學系 |
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
882411H002039.pdf | 41.04 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.