dc.description.abstract | Abstract
The thesis re-examines and establishes the deviant gender image of Dorian Gray in the context of Victorian intellectual and aesthetic culture. I argue that in The Picture of Dorian Gray, besides the well-known eccentric dandy, Lord Henry Wotton, Dorian Gray is an unprecedented gender figure that has long been ignored by most critics, and should thus be explored in details. Historically speaking, Oscar Wilde’s portrayal of this androgynous youth is not a singular, personal creation; the fictional character in fact crystallizes the Victorian Oxonians’ aesthetic pursuit of beautiful boy with ambiguous gender traits. And curiously enough, Dorian Gray is not only a captivating boy who employs the power of an invincible beauty, but also a sinner who hurts and kills both himself and others, and is therefore entirely excluded from the middle-class society. It is thus interesting to trace the historical background which moves Oscar Wilde to create such an androgynous character, to analyze how Dorian Gray functions as an anti-middle-class figure, and to probe into the possible implication of his overwhelming surface beauty.
The first chapter traces the Victorian cultural phenomena such as the Oxford Movement, Uranian poetry, W. E. Gladstone and Walter Pater’s aesthetic claim, and speculates the recurrently depicted androgynous characters in Wilde’s works, who are the young king, Mr. W. H., and Dorian Gray. The second chapter aims at exploring the anti-middle-class implication of Dorian Gray, through comparing him with Lord Henry Wotton, whose behaviors in fact never quite fulfills the anti-middle-class mode. The third chapter scrutinizes the camp sensibilities in the androgynous Dorian Gray, since he successfully exemplifies the rich potentialities of the shallow surface of beauty. In a word, Dorian Gray does not only epitomize the Victorian demands of boy’s ambiguous gender appearance, but also serves as an avant-garde figure that anticipates the twentieth-century camp challenge of deep subjectivity. He mirrors Oscar Wilde’s love for the enchanting youthful boy, and in the meantime unfolds his bitter conflicts with the heterosexual hegemony of the Victorian middle class. | en |
dc.relation.reference | Works Cited
Babuscio, Jack. “Camp and the Gay Sensibility.” In David Bergman ed., Camp Grounds: Style and Homosexuality. Amherst: U of Massachusetts P, 1993. 19-38.
Bebbington, David. The mind of Gladstone: Religion, Homer, and Politics. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2004. 178-187.
Beckson, Karl, ed. Oscar Wilde: The Critical Heritage. New York: Routledge, 1997.
---. “Love in Earnest: The Importance of Being Uranian.” London in the 1890s: A Cultural History. New York: Norton, 1992.
Bergman, David. “Introduction.” Camp Grounds: Style and Homosexuality. Amherst: U of Massachusetts P, 1993. 3-18.
Booth, Mark. “‘Campe-toi!: On the Origins and Definitions of Camp’.” In Fabio Cleto ed., Camp: Queer Aesthetics and The Performing Subject: A Reader. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 1999. 66-79.
Bristow, Joseph. “Wilde’s Fatal Effeminacy.” Effeminate England: Homoerotic Writing after 1885. New York: Columbia UP, 1995. 16-54.
Burne-Jones. New York: Rizzoli, 1979.
Clark, William Lane. “Degenerate Personality: Deviant Sexuality and Race in Ronald Firbank’s Novels.” In David Bergman ed., Camp Grounds: Style and Homosexuality. Amherst: U of Massachusetts P, 1993. 134-55.
Cleto, Fabio. “Introduction.” Camp: Queer Aesthetics and The Performing Subject: A Reader. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 1999. 1-43.
Cohen, Ed. “Writing Gone Wilde: Homoerotic Desire in the Closet of Representation.” In Regenia Gagnier ed., Critical Essays on Wilde. New York: Maxwell Macmillan International, 1991. 68-87.
---. “Typing Wilde.” Talk on the Wilde Side: Towards a Genealogy of a Discourse on Male Sexualities. New York: Routledge, 1993. 126-72.
Dellamora, Richard. “Pater at Oxford in1864: Old Mortality and ‘Diaphaneite’.” Masculine Desire: The Sexual Politics of Victorian Aestheticism. Chapel Hill: U of North Carolina P, 1990. 58-68.
Dowling, Linda. Hellenism and Homosexuality. New York: Cornell UP, 1994.
Ellmann, Richard. Oscar Wilde. New York: Vintage Books, 1988. 296-98.
Fanon, Frantz. Black Skin, White Masks. Trans. Charles Lam Markmann. New York: Grove Weidenfeld, [1991]. 185-194.
Foucault, Michel. The History of Sexuality: An Introduction. Trans. Robert Hurley. Vol. 1. New York: Pantheon Books, 1986. 42-43.
Gagnier, Regenia. “Introduction.” In Regenia Gagnier ed., Critical Essays on Wilde. New York: Maxwell Macmillan International, 1991.1-19.
---. “Sexuality, the Public, and the Art World.” In Regenia Gagnier ed., Critical Essays on Wilde. New York: Maxwell Macmillan International, 1991. 23-47.
---. “Introduction.” Idylls of the Marketplace: Oscar Wilde and the Victorian Public. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1986. 1-16.
Garber, Marjorie. Vice Versa: Bisexuality and the Eroticism of Everyday Life. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1995.
Gilmour, Robin. “Past and Present and early Victorian painting: Pre-Raphaelitism and after.” The Victorian Period: The Intellectual and Cultural Context of English Literature 1830-1890. New York: Longman, 1993. 206-217.
Hilton, Timothy. The Pre-Raphaelites. London: Thames & Hudson, 1970.
Isherwood, Christopher. ‘Notes on “Camp”.’ In Fabio Cleto ed., Camp: Queer Aesthetics and The Performing Subject: A Reader. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 1999. 49-52.
Jenkyns, Richard. “Homer and the Homeric Ideal.” The Victorians and the Ancient Greece. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1980. 192-226.
Jung, C. G. “The Psychology of the Child Archetype.” The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious. Trans. R. F. C. Hull. Beijing: China Social Sciences Publishing House, 1999.
Kohl, Norbert. “Introduction.” Oscar Wilde: The Rebel as Nonconformist. Trans. David Henry Wilson. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1989.
Paglia, Camille. “The Beautiful Boys as the Destroyer: Oscar Wilde’s The Picture of Dorian Gray.” Sexual Personae: Art and Decadence from Nefertiti to Emily Dickinson. New York: Vintage Books, 1991.
Pater, Walter. “Appendix: ‘Diaphaneite’.” The Renaissance: Studies in Art and Poetry. Ed. Adam Phillips. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1986.
---. “The Age of Atheletic Prizemen.” Greek Studies: A Series of Essays. 2nd ed. London: Macmillan, 1901. 284-292.
Plato, Symposium. Trans. Robin Waterfield. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1994. 24-30.
Ross, Andrew. “‘Uses of Camp’.” In Fabio Cleto ed., Camp: Queer Aesthetics and The Performing Subject: A Reader. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 1999. 308-29.
Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. “Toward the Gothic: Terrorism and Homosexual Panic.” Between Men: English Literature and Male Homosocial Desire. New York: Columbia UP, 1985. 97-117.
---. “Homophobia, Misogyny, and Capital: The Example of Our Mutual Friend.” Between Men: English Literature and Male Homosocial Desire. New York: Columbia UP, 1985. 161-79.
Sinfield, Alan. The Wilde Century. London: Cassell, 1994.
Sontag, Susan. “‘Notes on “Camp”’.” In Fabio Cleto ed., Camp: Queer Aesthetics and The Performing Subject: A Reader. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 1999. 53-65.
Wilde, Oscar. The Picture of Dorian Gray. Ed. Donald L. Lawler. New York: Norton, 1988.
---. The Works of Oscar Wilde. London: Spring Books, 1963.
---. Letters. Ed. Rupert Hart-Davis. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & World, 1962. 326. | en |