dc.description.abstract | This M.A. thesis investigates satire written by British women writers in the Restoration and the eighteenth century. Satire is a prominent genre in this period, but the traditional criticism and theory on satire appear to focus almost exclusively on male satirists. It seems that satire is a “masculine” genre dominated by male writers, and that women writers seldom write in this genre. However, through my survey on women writers in this period, I find that Augustan women did produce a large number of satires in different forms and that they wrote satire with considerable skills.
Chapter one of this study reviews the theories and criticism on satire in general, focusing on the important topics of satire such as its etymological definitions, its origins in primitive magical rituals and curses, its relation to genre, its nature and mechanism, its structures and satiric devices such as “satiric spectrum,” persona, irony, parody, etc., and also controversial issues in Augustan defence of satire.
Chapter two establishes the basic approach underlying the present study, contending that female satirists are not non-existent but only neglected both by their contemporaries and by modern scholarship. In this chapter I address issues such as similarities between satire and women writers, female satirist’s motivation and purpose in writing satire, difficulties facing Augustan female satirists, as well as how women writers manage to write satire in face of malignant opposition.
Chapters three to five explore satiric works by women writers in this period. Chapter three first investigates women’s contribution to the late seventeenth-century “satiric debate about women,” such as Sarah Fyge Egerton’s The Female Advocate (1686), “Eugenia’s” The Female Preacher (ca. 1699) and Lady Mary Chudleigh’s The Ladies Defence (1701). The chapter also discusses satiric poetry written by women poets, including Lady Mary Chudleigh, Anne Finch, Sarah Fyge Egerton, Elizabeth Thomas, Lady Mary Wortley Montagu, Sarah Dixon, Mary Leapor, Laetitia Pilkington, Esther Lewis, and Anna Laetitia Barbauld.
Chapter four focuses on satiric plays written by three prominent women playwrights, including Margaret Cavendish (1623-1673), Delarivier Manley (1672-1724), and Susanna Centlivre (1669-1723). I examine Cavendish’s several comedies and tragedies, Manley’s heroic tragedy The Royal Mischief (1696) and comedy The Lost Lover (1696), and Centlivre’s comedy The Busie Body (1709).
Chapter five investigates the prose satires by women satirists in this period, including Delarivier Manley’s The New Atlantis (1709), Mary Davys’s Familiar Letters betwixt a Gentleman and a Lady (1725), Sarah Fielding’s The Adventures of David Simple (1744), Charlotte Lennox’s The Female Quixote (1752), Frances Burney’s Evelina (1778), and Elizabeth Hamilton’s Memoirs of Modern Philosophers (1800).
The conclusion stresses that women writers indeed contribute a great deal to the genre of satire and deserve a more prominent place in the satiric tradition. A thorough investigation of satire by women writers in all periods is certainly worthwhile and helpful in unraveling the relationship between satire and gender and in understanding the nature of satire in general. | en |
dc.relation.reference | Alden, Raymond MacDonald. The Rise of Formal Verse Satire under Classical Influence. (1899). 2 Vols. Philadelphia: Archon, 1962.
Armstrong, Nancy. Desire and Domestic Fiction: A Political History of the Novel. New York: Oxford U P, 1986.
Atchley, Amy M. “Aphra Behn and Susanna Centlivre: A Materialist-Feminist Study.” Diss. Louisiana State U, 1995.
Bakhtin, Michael. Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Ed. and trans. Caryl Emerson. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1984.
Ballaster, Ros. “Manl(e)y Forms: Sex and the Female Satirist.” Women, Texts, & Histories 1575-1760. Ed. Clare Brant and Diane Purkiss. London: Routledge, 1992. 217-41.
Bloom, Edward A., and Lillian D. Bloom. Satire's Persuasive Voice. Ithaca: Cornell U P, 1979.
Bogel, Fredric V. “Irony, Inference, and Critical Uncertainty.” Yale Review 69 (1980): 503-19.
---. The Difference Satire Makes: Rhetoric and Reading from Jonson to Byron. Cornell: Cornell U P, 2000.
Buchanan, David. “Augustan Women’s Verse Satire.” Diss. U of Alberta, 1998.
Chaden, Caryn. “Mentored from the Page: Mary Leapor’s Relationship with Alexander Pope.” Pope, Swift, and Women Writers. Ed. Donald C. Mell. Newwark: U of Delaware P, 1996. 31-47.
Chastain, Stephanie G. “The Gendering of Humor: Toward a Feminist Narrative.” Diss. U of Washington, 1996.
Clark, Arthur Melville. “The Art of Satire and the Satiric Spectrum.” Studies in Literary Modes (1946): 31-49.
Connery, Brian A., and Kirk Combe. Theorizing Satire: Essays in Literary Criticism. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1995.
Doody, Margaret. The Daring Muse: Augustan Poetry Reconsidered. Cambridge: Cambridge U P, 1985.
Elkin, P. K. The Augustan Defence of Satire. Oxford: Clarendon, 1973.
Elliott, Robert C. The Power of Satire: Magic, Ritual, Art. Princeton: Princeton U P, 1960.
Fabricant, Carole. “The Shared Worlds of Manley and Swift.” Pope, Swift, and Women Writers. Ed. Donald C. Mell. Newwark: U of Delaware P, 1996. 154-178.
Finke, Laurie A. “The Satire of Women Writers in The Female Wits.” Restoration: Studies in English Literary Culture, 1660-1700 8 (1984): 64-71.
Foucault, Michel. The History of Sexuality. Vol. I: An Introduction. Trans. Robert Hurley New York: Vintage, 1980.
Frye, Northrop. “The Mythos of Winter: Irony and Satire.” Anatomy of Criticism. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1957. 223-42.
Gadeken, Sara F. “Evading the Salic Law of Wit: The Female Satirist and Sentimental Community in Sarah Fielding.” Diss. Syracuse U, 1996.
Gill, James E. Cutting Edges: Postmodern Critical Essays on Eighteenth-Century Satire. Knoxville: U of Tennessee P, 1995.
Griffin, Dustin. Satire: A Critical Re-Introduction. Lexington: U P of Kentucky, 1994.
Guilhamet, Leon. Satire and the Transformation of Genre. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P, 1987.
Jensen, H. James, and Malvin R. Zirker, ed. The Satirist's Art. Bloomington: Indiana U P, 1972.
Kernan, Alvin B. The Cankered Muse: Satire of the English Renaissance. New Haven: Yale U P, 1959.
Knight, Charles A. “Imagination’s Cerberus: Satire and the Metaphor of Genre.” Philological Quarterly 69 (1990): 131-51.
Landry, Donna. The Muses of Resistance: Laboring-Class Women’s Poetry in Britain, 1739-1796. Cambridge: Cambridge U P, 1990.
Lewis, Jayne. “Compositions of Ill Nature: Women’s Place in a Satiric Tradition.” Critical Matrix 2 (1986): 31-69.
Mack, Maynard. “The Muse of Satire.” 1951. Satire: Modern Essays in Criticism. Ed. Ronald Paulson. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1971. 190-201.
Medoff, Jeslyn S. “My Daring Pen”: The Autobiographical Poetry of Sarah Fyge (Field, Egerton), (1668-1723).” Diss. State U of New Jersey, 1994.
Mell, Donald C. ed. Pope, Swift, and Women Writers. Newwark: U of Delaware P, 1996.
Messenger, Ann. His and Hers: Essays in Restoration and Eighteenth-Century Literature. Lexington: U P of Kentucky, 1986.
Nokes, David. Raillery and Rage: A Study in Eighteenth-Century Satire. New York: St. Martin’s, 1988.
Nussbaum, Felicity. “Effeminacy and Femininity: Domestic Prose Satire and David Simple.” Eighteenth-Century Fiction 11 (1999): 421-44.
Olive, Barbara. “Woman Satirists of the Eighteenth Century: Towards a New Aesthetic?” Proceedings of the First Dakotas Conference on Earlier British Literature. 95-106.
Palmeri, Frank. Satire in Narrative: Petronius, Swift, Gibbon, Melville, and Pynchon. Austin: U of Texas P, 1990.
Paulson, Ronald. The Fictions of Satire. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins U P, 1967.
Phiddian, Robert. “A Name for Mock-Epic: Pope, Bakhtin, and Stylization.” The Eighteenth Century 37 (1996): 136-55.
Plimpton, Pamela Sue. “Inconstant Constancy: A Poetics of Seventeenth- and Eighteenth-Century British Women Poets, 1620-1825.” Diss. U of Oregon, 1998.
Pohli, Carol Virginia. “The Feminization of Wit: Satire by British Women Writers, 1600-1800.” Diss. Ohio State U, 1994.
Rabb, Melinda Alliker. “Angry Beauties: (Wo)Manley Satire and the Stage.” Cutting Edges: Postmodern Critical Essays on Eighteenth-Century Satire. Ed. James E. Gill. Knoxville: U of Tennessee P, 1995. 127-58.
Randolph, Mary Claire. “The Structural Design of the Formal Verse Satire.” 1942. Satire: Modern Essays in Criticism. Ed. Ronald Paulson. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1971. 171-89
Richetti, John J. Popular Fiction Before Richardson: Narrative Patterns, 1700-1739. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1969.
Riley, Lindy. “Mary Davys’s Satiric Novel Familiar Letters: Refusing Patriarchal Inscription of Women.” Cutting Edges: Postmodern Critical Essays on Eighteenth-Century Satire. Ed. James E. Gill. Knoxville: U of Tennessee P, 1995. 206-21.
Robinson, David Michael. To Boldly Go Where No Man Has Gone Before: The Representation of Lesbianism in Mid-Seventeenth- to Early Eighteenth-Century British and French Literature. Diss. U of California, Berkeley, 1998.
Rosenheim, Edward W. “The Satiric Spectrum.” 1963. Satire: Modern Essays in Criticism. Ed. Ronald Paulson. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1971. 305-29.
Seidel, Michael. Satiric Inheritance: Rabelais to Sterne. Princeton: Princeton U P, 1979.
Spacks, Patricia Meyer. “Some Reflections on Satire.” 1968. Satire: Modern Essays in Criticism. Ed. Ronald Paulson. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1971. 360-78.
Suzuki, Mihoko. “Margaret Cavendish and the Female Satirist.” SEL 37 (1997): 483-500.
Test, George A. Satire: Spirit and Art. Tampa: U of South Florida P, 1992.
Thaddeus, Janice. “Elizabeth Hamilton’s Modern Philosophers and the Uncertainties of Satire.” Cutting Edges: Postmodern Critical Essays on Eighteenth-Century Satire. Ed. James E. Gill. Knoxville: U of Tennessee P, 1995. 395-418.
Weinbrot, Howard D. Eighteenth-Century Satire: Essays on Text and Context from Dryden to Peter Pindar. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1988.
Williamson, Marilyn L. Raising Their Voices: British Women Writers, 1650-1750. Detroit: Wayne State U P, 1990.
Worcester, David. “From the Art of Satire.” 1940. Satire: Modern Essays in Criticism. Ed. Ronald Paulson. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1971. 115-34.
Zomchick, John. “Satire and the Bourgeois Subject in Frances Burney’s Evelina.” Cutting Edges: Postmodern Critical Essays on Eighteenth-Century Satire. Ed. James E. Gill. Knoxville: U of Tennessee P, 1995. 347-66. | en |