https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/157752
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor | 林光華 | en |
dc.contributor | 臺灣大學:物理治療學研究所 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | 陳建勳 | zh |
dc.contributor.author | Chen, Chien-Hsun | en |
dc.creator | 陳建勳 | zh |
dc.creator | Chen, Chien-Hsun | en |
dc.date | 2004 | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2007-11-29T05:43:20Z | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-07-08T16:32:01Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2007-11-29T05:43:20Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-07-08T16:32:01Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2004 | - |
dc.identifier | en-US | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw//handle/246246/63514 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 中文摘要 目的:本研究的目的,在探討可獨立行走的初次中風患者,健側下肢穿戴一個斜度5度的外楔型鞋墊後,於站立和行走時之生物力學改變。 方法: 16位來自臺大醫院復健部門診及住院的男性受試者均符合下列條件:(1)首次中風合併單側偏癱;(2)可獨立站立3分鐘以上,並能不用行走輔具,在平地獨立連續行走5公尺;(3)患側下肢行走時能將足部完全提離地面;(4)意識清楚,病情穩定,能了解並配合實驗指示者。沒有動作協調上的問題;排除合併有其他任何可能影響行走功能的嚴重骨骼、週邊神經、心肺系統方面問題者。利用三度空間動作分析系統與測力板,分析穿著外楔型鞋墊是否增加偏癱患者其站立與行走時患側腳承重,和姿勢的對稱性。 結果:健側腳穿戴5度外楔型鞋墊,其主要作用:(1)站立時增加患側下肢承重從體重的34.80%到38.00% (p=0.007);(2)垂直方向的地面反作用力,其對稱性指標(SI) 有明顯改善,從60.82%到48.02% (p=0.005);(3)走路時,整體站立期的SI有明顯改善,從18.55%到11.47% (p=0.033);(4)在健側下肢,單獨支撐期的垂直地面反作用力總和明顯下降,從5.49 ± 0.34 N/kg/sec到4.86 ± 0.26 N/kg/sec (p=0.026);以及整體站立期的反作用力平均值明顯下降,從7.21 ± 0.13N/kg 到6.94 ± 0.11 N/kg ( p=0.039);(5)在健側下肢整個走路的周期中,對側腳離地發生時間的百分比明顯上升(26.80% to 29.85%, p=0.039)和單腳支撐期的時間(0.57 second to 0.52 second, p=0.058)有明顯下降;(6)身體軀幹在走路周期中,側向位移角度的總和有明顯下降(p=0.020)。 結論:可獨立行走的中風患者於健側腳穿戴五度的外楔型鞋墊,在靜止站立時可增加患側下肢承重與兩腳對稱性。但是在走路時,外楔型鞋墊對於步態的影響並效果不一致。 關鍵字:步態、腦中風、偏癱、外楔型鞋墊 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Abstract Objective: To assess the biomechanical changes in ambulatory first stroke patients during stance and ambulation with and without wearing a 5° laterally wedged insole on the non-paretic side Method: Randomized cross-sectional design to compare the static standing and self-selected speed walking with and without the wedge under the non-paretic foot. The setting was in Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital (NTUH) in Taiwan. The inclusive criteria of sixteen participants were unilateral cerebrovascular accident (CVA) males with hemiparesis, who were asymmetry (symmetry index>10%) in standing, being able to stand independently for up to 3 minutes without rest, to walk on the ground over 5 meters without assistive device, and to understand and follow instructions, as well as without other neurological, and musculoskeletal and disease. Three dimensional motion analysis system and force plates were used for the kinematic and kinetic parameters of gait. Results: The effect of wearing 5° lateral wedged insole on the non-paretic limb in hemiparetic patients were as follows. (1) It increased the paretic limb weight bearing from 34.80% to 38.00% of body weight. (2) The symmetry index (SI) of vertical ground reaction force (GRF) had been significantly improved after wearing 5° lateral wedged insole in static standing (60.82% to 48.02%, p=0.005). (3) During walking, there were significant improvement in the SI of stance time (18.55% to 11.47%, p=0.033). (4) On the non-paretic limb, the impulse of single support phase and the mean vertical GRF of stance phase decreased significantly (5.49 ± 0.34 N/kg/sec to 4.86 ± 0.26 N/kg/sec, p=0.026; 7.21 ± 0.13N/kg to 6.94 ± 0.11 N/kg,, p=0.039, respectively), but the changes in the paretic limb were not significant. (5) In one gait cycle, there were significant changes in the increase of the percentage of opposite foot off, and the decrease in the time of single support on non-paretic side limb. (26.80% to 29.85% gait cycle, p=0.039 and 0.57 second to 0.52 second, p=0.043, respectively). (6) The integrated area of the thorax lateral sway angle during one gait cycle showed significant decrease (p=0.02). Conclusion: The simple mechanical device like 5° lateral wedged insole on the non-paretic side would improve the weight bearing and symmetry in hemiparetic patients during stance, but the changes during ambulation were variable. Keyword: gait, cerebrovascular accident, hemiplegia, lateral wedged insole | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄 1 中文摘要 3 Abstract 5 Chapter 1. Introduction 7 1.1 Background 7 1.2 Project Motivation 8 1.3 Aims and Hypothesis 9 1.4 Operational Definition 10 1.4.1 Gait cycle 11 1.4.2 Kinematic parameters—Temporal-distance parameters 12 1.4.3 Kinematic parameters—Postural changes 13 1.4.4 Kinetic parameters 13 1.4.5 Symmetry indices (SI) 14 Chapter 2. Literature Review 15 2.1 Hemiplegic gait 15 2.2 Symmetry and gait parameters 16 2.3 Forced use 19 2.4 Load receptor 21 2.5 Lateral wedged insole 22 Chapter 3. Research Methods 25 3.1 Participants 25 3.2 Study Design 26 3.3 Experimental Equipment 26 3.4 Wedge Fabrication 28 3.5 Experimental Protocol 29 3.5.1 Clinical Assessment 30 3.5.2 Motion Assessment 31 3.6 Data Reduction and Statistical Analysis 34 Chapter 4. Results 35 4.1 Demographic Data 35 4.2 Quiet Standing 35 4.3 Comfortable Speed Walking 36 4.3.1 Kinetic parameters 37 4.3.2 Kinematic parameters 39 Chapter 5. Discussion 53 5.1 Wedge Effect 53 5.1.1 Static Standing 53 5.1.2 Comfortable Speed Ambulation 54 5.2 Proposed Underlying Mechanisms 56 5.3 Research Limitation 58 5.4 Further Work 58 5.5 Conclusion 59 Reference 60 Appendix 64 | zh_TW |
dc.language | en-US | en |
dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
dc.subject | 外側楔型鞋墊 | en |
dc.subject | 偏癱 | en |
dc.subject | 步態 | en |
dc.subject | 腦中風 | en |
dc.subject | cerebrovascular accident | en |
dc.subject | gait | en |
dc.subject | hemiplegia | en |
dc.subject | lateral wedged insole | en |
dc.title | 外側楔型鞋墊對中風患者步態之影響 | zh |
dc.title | Effect of Lateral Wedged Insole on the Gait Pattern in Stroke individuals | en |
dc.type | other | en |
dc.relation.reference | Reference 1. Skilbeck CE, Wade DT, Hewer RL, Wood VA. Recovery after stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1983;46:5-8 2. Foulkes MA, Wolf PA, Price TR, Mohr JP, Hier DB. The stroke data bank: Design, methods, and baseline characteristics. Stroke. 1988;19:547-554 3. Carr JH, & Shepard, R. B. A motor relearning programme for stroke. Aspen Publishers. Gaithersburg, MD.; 1998. 4. Aruin AS, Hanke T, Chaudhuri G, Harvey R, Rao N. Compelled weightbearing in persons with hemiparesis following stroke: The effect of a lift insert and goal-directed balance exercise. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2000;37:65-72 5. Taub E, Uswatte G, Pidikiti R. Constraint-induced movement therapy: A new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation--a clinical review. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1999;36:237-251 6. Hill K, Schwarz J, Flicker L, Carroll S. Falls among healthy, community-dwelling, older women: A prospective study of frequency, circumstances, consequences and prediction accuracy. Aust N Z J Public Health. 1999;23:41-48 7. Wall JC, Turnbull GI. Gait asymmetries in residual hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1986;67:550-553 8. Hesse S, Reiter F, Jahnke M, Dawson M, Sarkodie-Gyan T, Mauritz KH. Asymmetry of gait initiation in hemiparetic stroke subjects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78:719-724 9. Rodriguez GM, Aruin AS. The effect of shoe wedges and lifts on symmetry of stance and weight bearing in hemiparetic individuals. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:478-482 10. Chaudhuri S, Aruin AS. The effect of shoe lifts on static and dynamic postural control in individuals with hemiparesis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81:1498-1503 11. Kakou H, Nagao Y, Omine S, Ochi M, Wada F, Hachisuka K, Togami H. [the clinical effect of lateral wedge on hemiplegic weight bearing]. J Uoeh. 2003;25:441-446 12. Perry J. Gait analysis, normal and pathological function. Thorofare, NJ: Charles B. Slack; 1992. 13. Bobath. Adult hemiplegia: Evaluation and treatment. London:Heineman,. 1978 14. Titianova EB, Tarkka IM. Asymmetry in walking performance and postural sway in patients with chronic unilateral cerebral infarction. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1995;32:236-244 15. De Bujanda E, Nadeau S, Bourbonnais D, Dickstein R. Associations between lower limb impairments, locomotor capacities and kinematic variables in the frontal plane during walking in adults with chronic stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2003;35:259-264 16. Hesse S, Bertelt C, Jahnke MT, Schaffrin A, Baake P, Malezic M, Mauritz KH. Treadmill training with partial body weight support compared with physiotherapy in nonambulatory hemiparetic patients. Stroke. 1995;26:976-981 17. Bohannon RW. Gait performance of hemiparetic stroke patients: Selected variables. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1987;68:777-781 18. Sadeghi H, Allard P, Prince F, Labelle H. Symmetry and limb dominance in able-bodied gait: A review. Gait Posture. 2000;12:34-45 19. Herzog W, Nigg BM, Read LJ, Olsson E. Asymmetries in ground reaction force patterns in normal human gait. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1989;21:110-114 20. Sackley CM. Falls, sway, and symmetry of weight-bearing after stroke. Int Disabil Stud. 1991;13:1-4 21. Titianova EB, Pitkanen K, Paakkonen A, Sivenius J, Tarkka IM. Gait characteristics and functional ambulation profile in patients with chronic unilateral stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;82:778-786; quiz 787-779, 823 22. Seeger BR, Caudrey DJ, Scholes JR. Biofeedback therapy to achieve symmetrical gait in hemiplegic cerebral palsied children. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1981;62:364-368 23. Dettmann MA, Linder MT, Sepic SB. Relationships among walking performance, postural stability, and functional assessments of the hemiplegic patient. Am J Phys Med. 1987;66:77-90 24. Winstein CJ, Gardner ER, McNeal DR, Barto PS, Nicholson DE. Standing balance training: Effect on balance and locomotion in hemiparetic adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1989;70:755-762 25. Brandstater ME, de Bruin H, Gowland C, Clark BM. Hemiplegic gait: Analysis of temporal variables. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1983;64:583-587 26. Wall JC, Ashburn A. Assessment of gait disability in hemiplegics. Hemiplegic gait. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1979;11:95-103 27. Mizrahi J, Susak Z, Heller L, Najenson T. Variation of time-distance parameters of the stride as related to clinical gait improvement in hemiplegics. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1982;14:133-140 28. Olney SJ, Griffin MP, McBride ID. Temporal, kinematic, and kinetic variables related to gait speed in subjects with hemiplegia: A regression approach. Phys Ther. 1994;74:872-885 29. Knapp HD, Taub E, Berman AJ. Movements in monkeys with deafferented forelimbs. Exp Neurol. 1963;7:305-315 30. Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, Cook EW, 3rd, Fleming WC, Nepomuceno CS, Connell JS, Crago JE. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74:347-354 31. Wolf SL, Lecraw DE, Barton LA, Jann BB. Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients. Exp Neurol. 1989;104:125-132 32. Davies PM. Steps to follow: A guide to the treatment of adult hemiplegia. Berlin, Germany: Springer Verlag; 1985. 33. Winstein CJ, Miller JP, Blanton S, Taub E, Uswatte G, Morris D, Nichols D, Wolf S. Methods for a multisite randomized trial to investigate the effect of constraint-induced movement therapy in improving upper extremity function among adults recovering from a cerebrovascular stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2003;17:137-152 34. Blanton S, Wolf SL. An application of upper-extremity constraint-induced movement therapy in a patient with subacute stroke. Phys Ther. 1999;79:847-853 35. Miltner WH, Bauder H, Sommer M, Dettmers C, Taub E. Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke: A replication. Stroke. 1999;30:586-592 36. Duysens J, Pearson KG. Inhibition of flexor burst generation by loading ankle extensor muscles in walking cats. Brain Res. 1980;187:321-332 37. Dietz V, Duysens J. Significance of load receptor input during locomotion: A review. Gait Posture. 2000;11:102-110 38. Dietz V. Evidence for a load receptor contribution to the control of posture and locomotion. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1998;22:495-499 39. Dietz V, Gollhofer A, Kleiber M, Trippel M. Regulation of bipedal stance: Dependency on "load" receptors. Exp Brain Res. 1992;89:229-231 40. Hayes SM. Gait awareness. In: Gillen G, Burkhardt A, eds. Stroke rehabilitation - a function based approach. St. Louis: mosby; 1998. 41. Yasuda K, Sasaki T. The mechanics of treatment of the osteoarthritic knee with a wedged insole. Clin Orthop. 1987:162-172 42. Kakihana W, Akai M, Yamasaki N, Takashima T, Nakazawa K. Changes of joint moments in the gait of normal subjects wearing laterally wedged insoles. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;83:273-278 43. Crenshaw SJ, Pollo FE, Calton EF. Effects of lateral-wedged insoles on kinetics at the knee. Clin Orthop. 2000:185-192 44. Kerrigan DC, Lelas JL, Goggins J, Merriman GJ, Kaplan RJ, Felson DT. Effectiveness of a lateral-wedge insole on knee varus torque in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:889-893 45. Brunnstrom s. Movement therapy in hemiplegia: A neurophysiological approach. New York:: Harper & Row; 1970. 46. Berg K, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI. The balance scale: Reliability assessment with elderly residents and patients with an acute stroke. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1995;27:27-36 47. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12:189-198 48. Kim CM, Eng JJ. Symmetry in vertical ground reaction force is accompanied by symmetry in temporal but not distance variables of gait in persons with stroke. Gait Posture. 2003;18:23-28 49. Lehmann JFE, P. C.Ko, M. J.Smith, J. C.DeLateur, B. J.Dralle, A. J. Plastic ankle-foot orthoses: Evaluation of function. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1983;64:402-407 50. Nester CJ, van der Linden ML, Bowker P. Effect of foot orthoses on the kinematics and kinetics of normal walking gait. Gait Posture. 2003;17:180-187 | en |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843 | - |
item.openairetype | other | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | en_US | - |
item.grantfulltext | none | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Products | - |
item.fulltext | no fulltext | - |
顯示於: | 物理治療學系所 |
在 IR 系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。