dc.relation.reference | 內政部統計處(2006)。九十五年第六週內政統計通報(94年身心障礙者福利服務概況)。台北:內政部。
行政院衛生署(2003)。輪椅衛教手冊。台北:衛生署。
毛慧芬、林佳琪、黃小玲、陳莞音、紀彣宙、蔡伯如(2006)。台北市輔具服務認知及滿意度調查。職能治療學會雜誌,24,頁55-66。
毛慧芬、姚開屏、黃小玲(2006)。科技輔具服務成果評量—標準化評量工具建立與服務成效驗證。(國科會一般型研究計畫,NSC93-2314-B-002-094, NSC94-2314-B-002-019)台北:台灣大學職能治療學系。
李淑貞、曾明 痋B黃玉怡、藍婉淑(2006)。ISO 9999:2002 (E) 身心障礙者輔助器具之11大分類中文名稱修正版。輔具之友,19,頁71。
吳英黛、胡名霞、柴惠敏、吳雪玉、毛慧芬(2004)。全國輔具使用現況調查研究。行政院衛生署委託研究報告。
身心障礙者醫療及輔助器具補助方法(民88)。中華民國八十八年十月六日台(88)內社字第八八九零六五二號令修正衛生署醫字第八八零五九一六九號公佈。
身心障礙者輔具資源與服務整合方案(2002)。上網日期:2003/5/21。World Wide Web: http://www.cc.nctu.edu.tw/~hcsci/service/assist_s.htm.
邱崇懿、羅鈞令(2005)。嬰幼兒日常職能活動活動量表之同時效度。職能治療學會雜誌,23,頁1-12。
胡名霞、柯志昌、柴惠敏、吳英黛(2004)。失能者輔具使用現況之初測報告。物理治療,29(6),頁396-403。
張宏哲(2006)。銀髮族與輔具。輔具之友,19,頁3-8。
黃小玲、羅鈞令、張彧、林佳琪、毛慧芬(2003)。復健病患出院後使用輔具之狀況。台灣醫學,7(5),頁681-688。
黃旐濤、陳建忠、黃一峰(2001)。身心障礙者輔具應用狀況分析及需求評估研究報告(國科會身心障礙者補助科技研究,NSC 89-2614-H-364-003-F20)。新竹:玄奘人文社會學院社會福利學系。
畢柳鶯(2001)。身心障礙者復健研究發展中心之營運規劃與發展之研究。內政部委託研究報告。
傅立葉、周月清、洪永泰、鄭夙芬(2000)。「台北市身心障礙者生活需求調查」研究報告書。台北市政府社會局委託研究報告。
鄧復旦、梁秋萍、周適偉、林聰樺、潘建理、裴育晟、朱岳喬、黎建中、杜國賢(2004)。身心障礙者對於個別化醫療復健輔助器具設計服務需求暨市場供需調查。台灣復健醫誌,32(1),頁1-10。
蔚順華、張雅如、石冀贏、江傳江(2000)。肢體障礙者個別化復健輔具之研究(行政院衛生署科技研究發展計畫,DOH90-TD-1193)。台北:國立陽明大學。
Algood, S. D., Cooper, R. A., Fitzgerald, S. G., Cooper, R., & Boninger, M. L. (2005). Effect of a pushrim-activated power-assist wheelchair on the functional capabilities of persons with tetraplegia. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86, 380-386.
Assistive Technology Act of 1998, Public Law 105-394.
Beattie, A. (1981). Aids to daily living for the patient with Parkinson’s disease. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 44, 53-33.
Benedict, R. E., Lee, J. P., Marrujo, S. K., & Farel, A.M. (1999). Assistive devices as an early childhood intervention: evaluating outcomes. Technology and Disability, 11, 79-90.
Bertocci, G., Karg, P., & Hobson, D. (1997). Wheeled mobility device database for transportation safety research and standards. Assistive Technology, rercwm.pitt.edu.
Brandt, A. & Iwarsson, S. (2001). Do certain groups of older people benefit the most from the use of powered wheelchairs? In J. Winters(ed.), RESNA Proceedings 2001(pp. 212–214), Arlington: RESNA Press.
Brandt, A., Iwarsson, S., & Stahl, A. (2003). Satisfaction with rollators among community-living users: a follow-up study. Disability and Rehabilitation, 25, 343-353.
Bursick, T. M., Trefler, E., Hobson, D. A., & Fitzgerald, S.(2000). Functional outcomes of wheelchair seating and positioning in the elderly nursing home population. The Proceedings of the Annual RESNA Conference (pp.316-318). Orlando,FL, June 28-July 2.
Chan, S.C. & Chan, A.P. (2006). The validity and applicability of the Chinese version of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction With Assistive Technology for people with spinal cord injury. Assistive Technology, 18, 25-33.
Chronbach, L. J. (1984). Essentials of psychological testing. (4th ed.). Harper and Row, New York.
Cook, A.M., & Hussey, S.M. (2002). Assistive technologies: Principles and practice (2nd ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
Cooper, R.A., Trefler, E., & Hobson, D.A. (1996). Wheelchairs and seating: Issues and practice. Technology and Disability, 5, 3-16.
Davis, G. M., Kofsky, P. R., Kelsey, J. C., & Shephard, R. J. (1981). Cardiorespiratory fitness and muscular strength of wheelchair users. Canadian Medical Association journal, 125, 1317-1323.
Day, H., & Jutai, J. (1996). PIADS: The psychosocial impact of assistive devices scale. Toronto: Authors.
Day, H., Jutai, J., & Campbell, K. A. (2002). Development of a scale to measure the psychosocial impact of assistive devices: lessons learned and road ahead. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24, 31-37.
Demers, L., Weiss-Lambrou, R., & Ska, B. (1996). Developmental of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST). Assistive Technology, 8, 3-13.
Demers, L., Ska, B., Giroux, F., & Weiss-Lambrou, R. (1999). Stability and reproducibility of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST). Journal of Rehabilitation Outcomes Measurement, 3(4), 42-52.
Demers, L., Wessels, R.D., Weiss-Lambrou, R., Ska, P., & De Witte, L. P. (1999). An international content validation of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST). Occupational Therapy International, 6(3), 159-175.
Demers, L., Weiss-Lambrou, R., & Ska, B. (2000). Item analysis of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST). Assistive Technology, 12, 96-105.
Demers, L., Wessels, R., Weiss-Lambrou, R., Ska, B., & De Witte, L.P. (2001). Key dimensions of client satisfaction with assistive technology: a cross-validation of a Canadian measure in the Netherlands. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 33, 187-191.
Demers, L., Monette, M., Lapierre, Y., Arnold, D.L., & Wolfson. C. (2002). Reliability , validity, and applicability of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0) for adults with multiple sclerosis. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24, 21-30.
Demers, L., Weiss-Lambrou, R., & Ska, B. (2002). The Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0): An overview and recent progress. Technology and Disability, 14, 101-105.
DeRuyter, F. (1995). Evaluating outcomes in assistive technology: Do we understand the commitment? Assistive Technology, 7, 3-8.
DeRuyter, F. (1997). The importance of outcome measures for assistive technology service delivery systems. Technology and Disability, 6(1), 89-104.
Ferguson-Pell, M. (1995). Jay Medical Lectureship: Seating and wheeled mobility research-The key to our future. Proceedings of the Eleventh International Seating Symposium, Pittsburgh, PA.
Freedman, V. A., Martin, L. G., & Schoeni, R. F. (2002). Recent Trends in Disability and Functioning Among Older Adults in the United States. JAMA,228, 3137-3146.
Fuhrer, M. J. (2001). Assistive technology outcomes research: challenges met and yet unmet. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 80, 528-535.
Fuhere, M. J., Jutai, J. W., Scherer, M. J., & DeRuyter, F. (2003). A framework for the conceptual modelling of assistive technology device outcomes. Disability and Rehabilitation, 25, 11243-1251.
Galvin, J. (1995). Comments on DeRuyter’s “Evaluating outcomes in assistive technology.” Assistive Technology, 7, 12-13.
Gelderblom, G. J. & De Witte, L. P. (2002). The assessment of assistive technology outcomes, effects and costs .Technology and Disability, 14, 91-94.
Gitlin, L. N., Luborsky, M. R., & Schemm, R. L. (1998). Emerging concerns of older stroke patients about assistive device use. Gerontologist, 38, 169-180.
Hammel, J. (1996). What’s the outcome? Multiple variables complicated the measurement of assistive technology outcomes. Rehab Management, 9, 97-99.
Hass, U., Brodin, H., Andersson, A., & Persson, J. (1997). Assistive technology selection: a study of participation of users with rheumatic arthritis. IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering, 5, 263-275.
Jacques, G. E., Ryan, S., Naumann, S., Milner, M., & Cleghorn, W. L. (1994). Application of quality function development in rehabilitation engineering. IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering, 2, 158-164.
Jedeloo, S., De Witte, L.P., Linssen, B.A., & Schrijvers, G. (2000). Satisfaction with and use of assistive devices and services for outdoor mobility. Technology and Disability, 13, 173-181.
Jedeloo, S., De Witte, L.P., Linssen, B.A., & Schrijvers, A.J. (2002). Client satisfaction with service delivery of assistive technology for outdoor mobility. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24, 550-557.
Jones, M.L., & Sandford, J.A. (1996). People with mobility impairments in the United States today and in 2010. Assistive Technology, 8, 45-53.
Keith, R. A. (1998). Patient satisfaction and rehabilitation services. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 79, 1122-1128.
Kohn, J. G., Mortola, P., & LeBlanc, M. (1991). Clinical trials and quality control: checkpoints in the provision of assistive technology. Assistive Technology, 3, 67-74.
Kohn, J. G., LeBlanc, M., & Mortola, P. (1994). Measuring quality and performance of assistive technology: results of a prospective monitoring program. Assistive Technology, 6, 120-125.
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of the observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174.
Lenker, J. A. & Paquet, V, L. (2003). A review of conceptual for assistive technology outcomes research and practice. Assistive Technology, 15, 1-15.
Levy, R. (1987). Evaluation of technology: Some arguments for a qualitative approach. Design Studies, 8, 224-230.
McNaughton, S. (1993). Connecting with consumers. Assistive Technology, 5, 7-10.
Mills, T., Holm, M. B., Trefler, E., Schmeler, M., Fitzgerald, S., & Boninger, M. (2002). Development and consumer validation of the Functional Evaluation in Wheelchair (FEW) instrument. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24, 38-46.
Minkel, J. L. (1996). Assistive technology and outcome measurement: where do we begin? Technology and Disability, 5, 285-288.
Nunally, J. C. & Bernstein, I. R. (1994). Psychometric theory, third edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Phillips, B. & Zhao, H. (1993). Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assistive Technology, 5, 36-45.
Plyum, S.M., Keur, T.J.A., Gerritsen, J., & Post, M.W.M. (1997). Community integration of wheelchair-bound athletes: A comparison before and after onset of disability. Clinical Rehabilitation, 11, 227-235.
Portney, L. G., & Watkins, M.P. (1993). Correlation. In L. G. Portney & M. P. Watkins (Eds.); Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice (pp. 439-456). Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange.
Portney, L. G., & Watkins, M.P. (2000). Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice. (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Reid, D., Laiberte-Rudman, D., & Hebert, D. (2002). Impact of wheeled seated mobility devices on adult user’s and their caregivers’ occupational performance: a critical literature review. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65, 261-280.
Reid, D.T. (2004). Critical review of the research literature of seating interventions: A focus on adults with mobility impairments. Assistive Technology, 14, 118-129.
Routhier, F., Vincent, C., Morissette, M. J., & Desaulniers, L. (2001). Clinical results of an investigation of paediatric upper limb myoelectric prosthesis fitting at the Quebec Rehabilitation Institute. Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 25, 119-131.
Sargent, C. A. (2002). Technology for mobility and locomotion. In D. A. Olson & F. Deruyter (Eds.), Clinician’s guide to assistive technology. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
Scherer, M. J. (1991). The Matching Person and Technology (MPT) Model (and assessment instruments). Rochester, NY: Author.
Scherer, M. J. (1993). The assistive technology device predisposition assessment: how does it measure up as a measure? Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 74, 665.
Scherer, M. J., & Galvin, J. C. (1997). Outcome and Assistive Technology. REHAB management, Feb./Mar., 103-105.
Scherer, M. J.(2002). Assistive Technology: Matching Device and Consumer for Successful Rehabilitation. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Simon, S.E. & Patrick, A. (1997). Understanding and assessing consumer satisfaction in rehabilitation. Journal of Rehabilitation Outcomes Measurement, 1(5), 1–14.
Smith, R.O. (1996). Measuring the outcomes of assistive technology: challenge and innovation. Assistive Technology, 8, 71-81.
Smith, C., McCreadie, M., & Unsworth, J. (1995). Prescribing wheelchairs: the opinions of wheelchair users and their carers. Clinical Rehabilitation, 9, 74-80.
Stanley, R.K., Stafford, D.J., Rasch, E., & Rodgers, M.M. (2003). Development of a functional assessment measure for manual wheelchair users. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 40, 301-307.
Stickel, M.S., Ryan, S., Rigby, P.J., & Jutai, J.W. (2002). Toward a comprehensive evaluation of the impact of electronic aids to daily living: evaluation of consumer satisfaction. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24, 115-125.
Technology-related Assistance for Individuals with Disability Act of 1988, Public Law 100-407.
Trachtman, L. (1994). Outcome measures: Are we ready to answer the tough questions? Assistive Technology, 6, 91–92
Trefler, E., Fitzgerald, S. G., Hobson, D. A., Bursick, T. M., & Joseph, R.(2004). Outcomes of Seating and Mobility Intervention with Residents of Long Term Care Facilities. Assistive Technology, 16,18-27.
Vachon, B., Weiss-Lambrou, R., Lacoste, M., & Dansereau, J. (1999). Elderly nursing home residents’ satisfaction with manual and power wheelchair. In Proceedings of the RESNA ‘99 Annual Conference (pp.221-223). Arlington, VA: RESNA Press.
Warren, C. G. (1993). Cost effectiveness and efficiency in assistive technology service delivery. Assistive Technology, 5, 61-65.
Weiss-Lambrou, R. (1993). Technologie en réadaptation. Undergraduate course notes, ERT 3318 Technology in Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, Montreal. Quebec, Canada.
Weiss-Lambrou, R., Tremblay, C., LeBlanc, R., Lacoste, M., & Dansereau, J. (1999). Wheelchair seating aids: how satisfied are consumers? Assistive Technology,11, 43-53.
Wessels, D. T., & De Witte, L. P. (2003). Reliability and validity of the Dutch version of QUEST 2.0 with users of various types of assistive devices. Disability and Rehabilitation, 25, 267-272.
Winter, P. L. & Keith, R.A. (1998). A model of outpatient satisfaction in rehabilitation. Rehabilitation Psychology, 33, 131-142.
York, J. (1989). Mobility methods selected for use in home and community environments. Physical Therapy, 69, 736-747.
Zastowny, T. R., Roghmann, K. J., & Cafferata, G. L. (1989). Patient satisfaction and the use of health services. Explorations in causality. Medical Care, 27, 705-723. | zh_TW |