https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/17245
標題: | 李景星《史記評議》研究 A Study on Li Jingxing’s Shiji Pingyi |
作者: | 黃羽詵 Huang, Yu-Shen |
關鍵字: | 李景星;司馬遷;《史記評議》;文學批評;史學評論;Li Jingxing;Sima Qian;Shiji Pingyi;literary critique;historical critique | 公開日期: | 2012 | 摘要: | 《史記評議》匯集了李景星《史記》研究的成果,內容包含分析《史記》文章的主旨與組織布局、司馬遷對歷史人物與事件的評論、《史記》闕漏增補的問題、論贊的內容與作用、對《史記》記載的考據與修訂。 李景星不僅是一位學識豐富的學者,更是熱心辦學的教育家。出於傳道、授業、解惑的教育熱誠,李景星《史記評議》除了處理歷來《史記》研究學者關注的議題,也指出《史記》中值得學者學習的作文述史的方法與價值判斷。 本文歸納李景星《史記評議》對《史記》的分析與評論,探討李景星如何理解司馬遷著作的用心與立意,指導讀者學習司馬遷作文述史的方法。期望能透過這篇論文,更深刻地瞭解《史記》之內容與旨趣,以及尋繹李景星《史記評議》的真知灼見與錯誤疏漏。 Li Jingxing’s Shiji Pingyi is his review and study of Sima Qian’s Shiji. Li analyzed the motifs and structure of every chapter of Shiji, Sima Qian’s comments on historical characters and events, and probed into the controversies over the disappearance of some part of Shiji and additional chapters written by later scholars. He also explored the content and the purpose of “Taishigong Yue.” Furthermore, he attempted to correct some errors in Shiji through the content of other records and books. Li Jingxing was an erudite scholar, as well as an enthusiastic educationist. He worked on the issues regarding Shiji that other scholars were interested in, and also pointed out the strengths of Shiji for scholars to learn and model, namely the way it narrates history and its value judgments. This study explores Li Jingxing’s analysis and review of Shiji, to find out what Li understood of Sima Qian’s purpose and how Li taught others to learn the methods of writing and narration from Shiji. It is hoped that this study will lead to a greater understanding of Shiji and Sima Qian and be able to outline Li Jingxing’s creative viewpoints and misunderstandings of Shiji. |
URI: | http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw//handle/246246/251432 |
顯示於: | 中國文學系 |
檔案 | 描述 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
ntu-101-R96121011-1.pdf | 23.54 kB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
在 IR 系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。