https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/17329
標題: | 《老子》論兵與《孫子兵法》關係研究 Lao Zi’s Dissertation On Philosophical-Militaristic Strategies Versus The Arts Of War By Sun Zi |
作者: | 何澤恆 | 關鍵字: | 老子;孫子兵法;辯證法;Lao Zi;The Arts of War by Sun Zi;dialectic | 公開日期: | 31-七月-2003 | 出版社: | 臺北市:國立臺灣大學中國文學系暨研究所 | 摘要: | 近年學者多稱自唐代王真指稱《老子》為一部兵書,清初王夫之以至近代 章太炎,皆持相同見解。此說細案並未盡實,然近年學者每有援據以為立說基 礎而續加發揮者,謂其書或直接,或間接,皆與軍事戰略、戰術思想相關。然 亦有持不同意見者,則僅承認《老子》書中富含樸素辯證法思想,保存、吸收 及發展兵家許多觀念,但不認為逕可視之為一部兵書。自此一問題開展,便牽 引出《老子》與《孫子兵法》二書間之關係的另一問題。本研究計畫即針對這 兩個相關論題進行研究。研究步驟為先梳理二書中與本題相關之論述,辨正其 義解,分析二書之思想特質。本此基礎,進而比較二書思想之基本異同,從而 檢視《老子》兵學論述與《孫子兵法》之關係。此一研究之目的,在釐清近年 學者就樸素辯證法論述《孫子兵法》《老子》二書之含混處,並試圖解決上述 《老子》是否為兵書之爭議。 The prevalent view that Wang Zheng of Tang dynasty ventured the proposition that the highly regarded Lao Zi—as a work of philosophy by the scholar Lao Zi—was in truth a work on battlefield strategies. Wang Fu-Zhi of Ching Dynasty was a strong supporter for the proposition, many scholars along the way have stated one case or the other in related studies. Most arguing against the direct categorization would acknowledge that Lao Zi’s simple dialectic approach to topics defined and shaped many militarian issues and concepts. This recognition then led to the interesting question of whether or not Lao Zi can indeed in some way be linked to the well-recognized The Arts Of War By Sun Zi. My research intends to: set up indices of studies done on the two works; interpret and clarify points of views as they relate to the issue; compare and analyze the theses as well as systematically-classified details of the two works; and thereupon try to answer the question of linkage, and eventually to attempt a resolution to whether or not Lao Zi is indeed also a work on the arts of war. |
URI: | http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw//handle/246246/4410 | 其他識別: | 912411H002028 | Rights: | 國立臺灣大學中國文學系暨研究所 |
顯示於: | 中國文學系 |
檔案 | 描述 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
912411H002028.pdf | 40.98 kB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
在 IR 系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。