Repository logo
  • English
  • 中文
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. College of Liberal Arts / 文學院
  3. Philosophy / 哲學系
  4. Hieroglyph and Heterogenesis: On Deleuze’s Question of Thinking
 
  • Details

Hieroglyph and Heterogenesis: On Deleuze’s Question of Thinking

Date Issued
2007
Date
2007
Author(s)
Ho, Bao-Shen
DOI
zh-TW
URI
http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw//handle/246246/56442
Abstract
This thesis studies Deleuze’s question of thinking. Firstly, I attempt to demonstrate that, for Deleuze, thinking is a mode of man’s Being-in-the-world, the essence of which consists in the hieroglyphic experience where body, language and thinking are entirely heterogeneous to one another. Secondly, I shall point out that, by stylizing the concept of hieroglyphic experience, thinking turns from a mode of man’s being into an active creation of man’s new being. Insofar as the latter is borne from something entirely other through thinking, thinking is precisely heterogenesis, namely a creation that always creates the different. In this thesis, both a historical and a systematic analysis are adopted as method. In order to provide a referential context for Deleuze’s question of thinking, I discuss firstly Heidegger’s question of thinking in the second chapter. For Heidegger, thinking is a mode of Dasein’s Being, the essence of which consists in the intentional experience where language is innately directed to body. On the other hand, since Dasein’s Being means the process of Dasein’s concrete action, thinking is also a continuous creation of intentional experience in a more profound sense. Summarily, then, Heidegger’s thinking is both the mode of man’s Being-in-the-world and the creation of it. In the third chapter, I try to interpret Deleuze’s own concept of man’s being in the world through his critique of Heidegger. According to his critique, the intentional experience presupposes the innateness of thought, and therefore cannot account for how a new way of thinking is borne from learning and experiment. For Deleuze, this is possible only if body enacts the heterogeneous relation among language, thinking and itself, so that no innate relation among them holds at all. A Being-in-the-world that revolves around the body and consists in such a heterogeneous relation is what I call a hieroglyphic experience. The next chapter then sets out to explicate Deleuze’s question of thinking through this concept of hieroglyphic experience. What Difference and Repetition calls “thought without image” is precisely thinking as a mode of hieroglyphic experience. However, since Difference and Repetition treats the body in a rather abstract manner, thought without image is far from a real creation. It is not until A Thousand Plateaus that body is treated both as the real and the active agent, so that thinking finally turns into the heterogenesis of an abstract life hitherto unknown to the corporeality of hieroglyphic experience. Finally, I try to re-examine Deleuze’s question of thinking from both a synchronic and a diachronic viewpoint. Synchronically, just like Heidegger’s question of thinking, Deleuze’s own question of thinking undergoes a metamorphosis from the concept of Being-in-the-world to the creation of it. However, since this concept of Being-in-the-world is modeled after a particular experience, it is necessarily a reductive interpretation of the fundamental complexity of the world. As a consequence, the creation of thinking borne from such Being-in-the-world is not radical enough to create the new. I then shift to the diachronic viewpoint to investigate in what such complexity might consist. Diachronically, Deleuze’s question of thinking is based on his concept of hieroglyphic experience, which is a radical critique of Heidegger’s concept of intentional experience. But precisely because Deleuze privileges body with the absolute power to enact the heterogeneous relation, he overlooks the already presupposed complexity among body, language and thinking. I suggest that perhaps the free inter-relation and interaction among body, language and thinking might provide a clue to experience, understand and create such complexity.
Subjects
在世存有
身體
語言
思考
異象
異生
Being-in-the-world
body
language
thinking
hieroglyph
heterogenesis
Type
thesis
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

ntu-96-R92124004-1.pdf

Size

23.53 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum

(MD5):3e6ad6553ae84ade5b5202037a35f9e8

臺大位居世界頂尖大學之列,為永久珍藏及向國際展現本校豐碩的研究成果及學術能量,圖書館整合機構典藏(NTUR)與學術庫(AH)不同功能平台,成為臺大學術典藏NTU scholars。期能整合研究能量、促進交流合作、保存學術產出、推廣研究成果。

To permanently archive and promote researcher profiles and scholarly works, Library integrates the services of “NTU Repository” with “Academic Hub” to form NTU Scholars.

總館學科館員 (Main Library)
醫學圖書館學科館員 (Medical Library)
社會科學院辜振甫紀念圖書館學科館員 (Social Sciences Library)

開放取用是從使用者角度提升資訊取用性的社會運動,應用在學術研究上是透過將研究著作公開供使用者自由取閱,以促進學術傳播及因應期刊訂購費用逐年攀升。同時可加速研究發展、提升研究影響力,NTU Scholars即為本校的開放取用典藏(OA Archive)平台。(點選深入了解OA)

  • 請確認所上傳的全文是原創的內容,若該文件包含部分內容的版權非匯入者所有,或由第三方贊助與合作完成,請確認該版權所有者及第三方同意提供此授權。
    Please represent that the submission is your original work, and that you have the right to grant the rights to upload.
  • 若欲上傳已出版的全文電子檔,可使用Open policy finder網站查詢,以確認出版單位之版權政策。
    Please use Open policy finder to find a summary of permissions that are normally given as part of each publisher's copyright transfer agreement.
  • 網站簡介 (Quickstart Guide)
  • 使用手冊 (Instruction Manual)
  • 線上預約服務 (Booking Service)
  • 方案一:臺灣大學計算機中心帳號登入
    (With C&INC Email Account)
  • 方案二:ORCID帳號登入 (With ORCID)
  • 方案一:定期更新ORCID者,以ID匯入 (Search for identifier (ORCID))
  • 方案二:自行建檔 (Default mode Submission)
  • 方案三:學科館員協助匯入 (Email worklist to subject librarians)

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science