https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/21328
Title: | 《雜阿含經》的「涅槃觀」是一種玄秘主義嗎? Is the Perspective on Nirvāṇa in the Saṃyuktāgama-Sūtra a Kind of Mysticism? |
Authors: | 黃森簇 Huang, Sen-Tsu |
Keywords: | 緣起;眾生;世間;涅槃;玄秘主義;史泰司 | Issue Date: | 2014 | Abstract: | 對世間確實情形的探究,須憑藉經驗材料之內容,根據經驗內容的不同,可分類出一類稱為玄秘經驗者。玄秘經驗有別於一般日常經驗並且相對稀有,但仍見於世界許多文化及學說系統中,似乎不容直接忽視。而廣義來說,關於此類經驗的研究,便稱為玄秘主義。而在哲學學門,所關心的莫過於此類經驗能提供或影響思想的理據何在。 在佛教系統中,許多解釋世界的觀念及藉由修行而達致的成果,都能當成玄秘主義研究的材料。學界的研究中,W. T. Stace的研究目標清楚,研究架構完整,並有一定的研究成果。但其研究方法以及對佛教材料的解讀或詮釋似乎有待商榷,研究方法上,由於起因無關原則,而必須迂迴地說明玄秘經驗的可靠度;材料解讀上,對佛教的涅槃、空、非我等概念的解析也是不適切的。 本文主要根據《雜阿含經》,從佛教對眾生與世間的觀看與分析著手,進而帶出幾個佛教的主要觀念,包括緣起、無常、空、不二等。以此作為先備工作,搭配經典中對涅槃的界說與講述,形成整套佛教的涅槃觀,導向涅槃的條理為:藉由觀察事物、現象的緣起無常,進而知道如何好好地面對種種感受,而不生起貪、瞋、癡等心態表現,由此而不生起種種煩惱,如此的情況便稱為涅槃。 接著,藉由對Stace研究內容的批判,期望從中尋求更適切的研究態度與方向。由於玄秘主義研究時常涉及跨學說系統的比較或參照,學者應先盡量避免成見地探究個別學說系統的內容,再以此為基礎,嘗試跨學說的研究。本文也將以「不二」觀念回應《雜阿含經》的「涅槃觀」與玄秘主義的關聯。 In order to inquiry reality of the lifeworlds, we have to rely on the content of experience. Depending on the content of experience , can be classified out of a class called mystical experience. Unlike ordinary daily experience, mystical experience are relatively rare. It still found in many cultures or theories though. It seems that we shouldn''t ignore mystical experience. In a broad sense, research on such experiences could be called mysticism. In the philosophical discipline, especially concern on how mystical experiences can provide ideas or knowledge. In Buddism, many ideas and achievements can be saw as the research materials of mysticism. W. T. Stace show a all-round research. But its research methods and interpretation of Buddhism Sūtra seems questionable. Due to the principle of causal indifference, It''s hard to justify the reliability of mystical experience. Besides, Its interpretation of Nirvāṇa, empty and non-self are inadequate. This paper will start on the view of sentient beings and lifeworlds in Saṃyuktāgama-Sūtra, and then bring out main ideas of Buddhism, including dependent co-arising, impermanence, empty, non-duality and middle way. And then explain and discuss the perspective on Nirvāṇa in Saṃyuktāgama-Sūtra. By observing the co-arising and impermanence of Dharma, one will know how to face all sorts of feelings, then achieve destruction of lust, hatred and delusion, this is called Nirvāṇa. And then, by the critique of Stace, seek a more appropriate attitude and direction of research. Because the research of mysticism often involves comparing different culture''s theories, scholars should try to avoid prejudices to explore the individual theory first. And base on this, start to handle multiple cultural theories. Besides, this paper will use the idea of non-duality to reply the topic. |
URI: | http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw//handle/246246/262556 | Rights: | 論文公開時間:2014/03/09 論文使用權限:同意有償授權(權利金給回饋學校) |
Appears in Collections: | 哲學系 |
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
ntu-103-R98124007-1.pdf | 23.54 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.