dc.relation.reference | 一、中文部分
巴頓(Patton, M. Q.)(1995)。質的評鑑與研究(Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods)(吳芝儀、李奉儒譯)。臺北縣新店市:桂冠。(原作1990年出版)
王梅玲(民92年)。從學術出版的變遷探討學者、出版者與圖書館的角色。國家圖書館館刊,92(1),頁67-93。
吳雅慧(民91年)。電子期刊使用研究 : 以國立臺灣大學電資學院及文學院為例。未出版之碩士論文,臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所,台北市。
李郁雅(民89年)。博士論文研究歷程中情境與資訊行為之探索:以植物分類學為例。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所,台北市。
周秀貞(民87年)。半導體文獻之書目計量學研究。未出版之碩士論文,淡江大學教育資料科學學系,台北縣淡水鎮。
林玉雲(民87年)。中央研究院歷史語言研究所研究人員之文物使用行為研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺灣大學圖書館學研究所,台北市。
林玲君(民88年)。國立藝術學院教師資訊行為之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所,台北市。
洪曉珊(民91年)。從知識管理角度探討電子商務組織資訊行為之模式。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所,台北市。
胡幼慧主編(民85年)。質性研究:理論、方法與本土女性研究實例。臺北市:巨流。
徐一綺(民84年)。我國大型資訊電子業從業人員資訊需求之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺灣大學圖書館學研究所,台北市。
國立臺灣大學電機資訊學院簡介。上網日期:民93年5月4日。網址:http://www.ee.ntu.edu.tw/college/history/4.html。(2004/5/4)
國立臺灣大學電機資訊學院簡介:單位組織及師生結構。上網日期:民93年5月4日。網址:http://www.ntu.edu.tw/chinese/main.html
郭麗芳(民85年)。網路電子期刊之評估研究:以生物醫學資源為例。未出版之碩士論文,輔仁大學圖書管理學系,台北縣新莊市。
陳雪華(民83.12)。電子期刊的過去、現在與未來。圖書館學刊,9,頁35-48。
傅雅秀(民85年)。從科學傳播的觀點探討中央研究院生命科學專家的資訊尋求行為。未出版之博士論文,國立臺灣大學圖書館學研究所,台北市。
傅雅秀(民88年)。從圖書資訊學的觀點探討科學傳播。臺北市:漢美。
葉乃靜,林珊如(民91年)。女性日常資訊行為之探索。在美國資訊科學學會臺北分會主辦。資訊使用研究學術研討會論文集。臺北市。
臺灣大學2004統計年報。上網日期:民94年7月7日。網址:http://acct2004.cc.ntu.edu.tw/acct2004/acct7/16.doc 。
蔡明月(民90年)。引用文獻分析與引用動機研究。教育資料與圖書館學,38(4),頁385-406。
蘇小鳳(民90.12)。歐美學術界對電子期刊的接受度:數據性質調查分析。教育資料與圖書館學,39(2),頁131-144。
蘇慧捷(民91年)。自助旅遊者之資訊需求與資訊使用行為。在美國資訊科學學會臺北分會主辦。資訊使用研究學術研討會論文集。臺北市。
二、英文部分
Aerni, S. E. et. al.(2003). Patterns of journal use by faculty at three diverse universities. D-Lib Magazine, 9(10). Retrieved Aprl. 7, 2004, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/october03/king/10king.html
Allen, T. J., & Andiren, Jr. M. P.(1965). Time allocation among three technical information channels by R&D engineers, Report No.131-65, Research program on the management of science and technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass. 引自Annual review of information science and technology, 1, New York : Interscience Publishers,1966.
Armstrong, C. et al. (Jun 2003). Trends in use of electronic journals in higher education in the UK: Views of academic staff and students. D-Lib Magazine, 9 (6), No page numbers. Retrieved Dec. 25, 2003, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june03/urquhart/06urquhart.html
Ayres, F. H.(2001). Authority control simply does not work. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 32(2), 49-59.
Bailey, C.W.(1995). Networked-based electronic publishing of scholarly works: A selective Bibliography. The Public-Access Computer System Review, 6(1), 5-21.
Bar-Ilan, J., Peritz, B. C., & Wolman, Y. (2003).A survey on the use of electronic databases and electronic journals accessed through the web by the academic staff of Israeli universities. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 29(6).346-361.
Bauer, K., Parker, K., & Sullenger, P. (2003). E-journals and citation patterns: Is it all worth it? Serials Librarian, 44(3/4), 209-213.
Belefant-Miller, H., & King, D. W. (2001). How, what, and why science faculty read. Science and Technology Libraries,19(2), 91-112.
Belkin, N.(1980). Anomalous states of knowledge as basis for information retrieval. The Canadian Journal of Information Science, 5, 133-143.
Blaxter, L., Hughes, C., & Tight, M.(2001). How to research. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Bordens, K. S., & Abbott, B. B. (1996). Research design and methods : A process approach. Mountain View, Calif: Mayfield, 20-26.
Borgman, C. et al. (c1990). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Newbury Park : Sage Publications.
Brandt, S. (1992). Accessing electronic journals. Academic and Library Computing, 9(10), 17.
Brown, C. D. (2002).Straddling the humanities and social sciences: The research process of music scholars. Library and Information Science Research, 24(1) , 73-94.
Chang, S. L. (1995). Toward a multidimensional framework for understanding browsing. Unpublished doctorial dissertation, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersy.
Chu, C. M. (1992). The scholarly process and the nature of the information needs of the literary critic : A descriptive model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
Cole, C.(1998). Information acquisition in history PH.D. students: Inferencing and the formation of knowledge structures, Library Quarterly, 68(1), 33-54..
Court, A. W., Ullman, D.G.., & Culley, S. J. (1998). A comparison between the provision of information to engineering designers in the UK and the USA. International Journal of Information Management, 18(6), 409-425.
Crawford, S. (1978). Information needs and uses. In Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 13, (pp.61-81). N. Y.: Interscience Publishers.
Dervin, B. (1992). From the mind’s eye of the user: The sense-making qualitative-quantitative methodology. In J. D. Glazier, & R.R. Powell (Eds.), Qualitative research in information management. (pp.327-338). Englewood, Colo.: Libraries Unlimited.
Dervin, B., & Nilan, M.(1986). Information needs and use. In Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 21, (pp. 3-33). N. Y.: Interscience Publishers.
Dym, C. L., & Little, P. (2000). Engineering design : A project-based introduction. New York : John Wiley, 22-33.
Elsevier. (2005). All Journals. Retrieved Jul. 2, 2005, from http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journal_browse.cws_home
Erdelez, S. (1997). Information encountering: A conceptual framework for accidental information discovery. In P. Vakkari, R. Savolainen, & B. Dervin (Eds.), Information seeking in context : Proceedings of an international conference on research in information needs, seeking and use in different contexts. (pp.412-421). Los Angeles : Taylor Graham.
Garson, L. R., & Howard, J. G. (1984). Electronic publishing: Potential benefits and problems for authors, publishers, and libraries. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, 24, 123.
Garvey, W. D. & Compton, J.(Eds.) (1979). Communication: The Essence of Science. New York: Pergmon Press.In D. W. King, & J. Casto, H. Jones, (1994). Communication by engineers: A Literature Review of Engineers' Information Needs, Seeking Processes, and Use. Washington, D.C.: Council on Library Resources.
Graziano, A. M., & Raulin, M. L. (1989). Research methods: A process of inquiry. N.Y: Harper & Row.
Griffths, JM., & King, D. W. (1993). Special libraries: Increasing the information edge. Washington, DC: Special Libraries Association.
Gross,P. L. K. & Gross, E. M. (1927). College libraries and chemical education. Science, 66, 385-389.
Harter, S. P. & Kim, H. J. (1996). Electronic journals and scholarly communication: A citation and reference study. Information Research, 2(1), No Page Numbers. Retrieved Nov. 19, 2003, from http://InformationR.net/ir/2-1/paper9a.html
Harter, S. P. (1996). The impact of electronic journals on scholarly communication: A citation analysis. The Public-Access Computer Systems Review, 7(5), No Page Numbers. Retrieved Sep. 24, 2003, from http://info.lib.uh.edu/pr/v7/n5/cont7n5.html
Hertzum, M., & Pejtersen, A. M. (2000). The information-seeking practices of engineers: Searching for documents as well as for people. Information Processing and Management, 36(5), 761-778.
Hicks, B. J. et, al. (2002). A framework for the requirements of capturing, storing and reusing information and knowledge in engineering design. International Journal of Information Management, 22(4), 263-280.
Hills, P. J. (1983). The scholarly communication process. In Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 18, 99-125.
Jeon-Slaughter, H. (2002). Electronic journals and scholarly communication. Presentation on Annual meeting of Special Libraries Association. Retrieved Aprl. 21, 2004, from http://ejust.stanford.edu/sla_0602.pdf
Kelland, J. L., &Young, A. P. (1994). Citation as a form of library use. Collection Management, 19(1/2), 81-100.
Keyhani, A.(1993). The Online Journal of Current Clinical Trials: an innovation in electronic journal publishing. Database, 16 (1), 14-23.
King, D. W., & Tenopir, C. (1999). Using and reading scholarly literature. In Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 34, New York : Interscience Publishers.
King, D. W., Casto, J., & Jones, H. (1994). Communication by engineers: A Llterature review of engineers' information needs, seeking processes, and use. Washington, D.C.: Council on Library Resources.
Leckie, G. J., Pettigrew, K. E., & Sylvain, C.(1996). Modeling the information seeking of professionals: A general model derived from research on engineers, health care professionals, and lawyers. Library Quarterly, 66(2), 161-193.
Line, M. B. (1975). Concluding observasions. In S. Stone(Ed.), Humanities information research: Proceedings of a seminar. Sheffiled, UK: Centre for Research on User Studies, University of Sheffield.
Macmullin, S., & Taylor, R. S. (1984). Problem dimensions and information traits. The Information Society, 3(1), 91-111, In B. Dervin, M. Nilan (1986). Information needs and use. In M. E. Williams (Eds.), Annual review of information science and technology, 21, (pp. 3-33). N. Y.: Interscience Publishers.
Martin, R. S. (c1993). Scholarly Communication in an Electronic Environment : Issues for Research Libraries. Chicago: Rare Books and Manuscript[s] Section, Association of College and Research Libraries, American Library Association.
McKnight, C., & Price, S. (1999) A survey of author attitudes and skills in relation to article publishing in paper and electronic journals. Journal of Documentation, 55(5). 556-576.
Mehta, U., & Young, V. E.(1995). Use of electronic information resources: A survey of science and engineering faculty. Science and Technology Libraries, 15(3), 43-54.
Mikhailov, A.I., Chernyi, A. I., and Giliarevskii, R. S. (1984). Scientific communications and informatics. Trans. R. H. Burger. Arlingon, Va.: Information Resources Press.
Monopoli, M. et al. (2002). A user-oriented evaluation of digital libraries: Case study the 'electronic journals' service of the library and information service of the University of Patras, Greece. Aslib Proceedings, 54(2), 103-17.
Nelson, D. (2001). The uptake of electronic journals by academics in the UK, their attitudes towards them and their potential impact on scholarly communication. Information Services and Use, 21(3/4), 205-214.
Newcomb, J. (1983). Electronic information distribution: The role of the tradition publishing and the librarian. Special Libraries, 73, 150-153.
Paisley, W. (1984). Communication in the communication sciences. In B. Dervin and M. J. Voigt (Eds.), Progress on communication sciences, v.5, (pp.1-43). Norwood, N. J.: Ablex.
Pinelli, T. E. (2001). Distinguishing engineers from scientists: The case for an engineeringknowledge community. Science and Technology Libraries, 21(3/4), 131-163.
Price, D. J. de S. (1986). Little science, big science-- and beyond. New York : Columbia University Press.
Rogers, S. A. (2001). Electronic journal usage at Ohio State University. College and Research Libraries, 62(1), 25-34.
Schauder, D. (1994). Electronic publishing of professional articles: Attitudes of academics and implications for the scholarly communication industry. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(2), 73-100.
Shamp, S. A. (1992). Prospects for electronic publication in communication: A survey of potenrial users. Communication Quarterly, 40(3), 297-304.
Shoham, S. (1998). Scholarly communication: A study of Israeli academic researchers. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 30(2), 113-121.
Shuchman, H. L. (1982). Information technology and the technologist: A report on a national study of american engineers. International Federation for Documentation, 7(1), 3-8.
Smith, E. T. (May 2003). Changes in faculty reading behaviors: The impact of electronic journals on the University of Georgia. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 29(3), 162-168.
Speier, C. et al. (1999). Faculty perceptions of electronic journals as scholarly communication: A question of prestige and legitimacy. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(6), 537-543.
Subramanyam, K. (1983). Scientific and technical journals: Developments and prospects. In Ellis Mount (Ed.), Role of serials in sci- tech libraries. (pp. 3-19.) N.Y.: Haworth.
Taylor, R. (1991). Information use environments. In B. Dervin, & Melvin J. Voigt (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences. V.10. (pp.217-254). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
Tenner, E., & Yang, Z.Y. (1999). End-user acceptance of electronic journals: A case study from a major academic research library. Technical Services Quarterly, 17(2), 1-14.
Tenopir, C., & King, D. W. (2000). Towards electronic journals: Realities for scientists, librarians, and publishers. Washington, DC: Special Libraries Association.
Tomney, H., & Burton, P. F. (1998). Electronic journals: A case study of usage and attitudes among academics. Journal of Information Science, 24(6), 419-29.
Ulrich's periodicals directory. v1. (2001). 39th ed. New York : Bowker.
Ulrich's periodicals directory. v1. (2005). 43rd ed. New York : Bowker.
Vakkari, P. (1997). Information seeking in context: A challenging metatheory. In P. Vakkari, R. Savolainen, & B. Dervin (Eds.), Information seeking in context : proceedings of an International Conference on Research in Information Needs, Seeking and Use in Different Contexts. (pp. 451-464). Los Angeles: Taylor Graham.
Weinstock, M. (1972). Citation index. In A. Kent, & H. Lancour (Ed.), Encyclopedia of library and information science, Vol.5.(pp.16-40) New York: Marcel Dekker.
White, M. D. (1975). The communications behavior of academic economists in research phases. Library Quarterly, 45(4), 337-354.
Wilson, T. (1994). Information needs and uses: Fifty years of progress? In Brian C. Vickery (Ed.), Fifty years of information progress: A journal of documentation review (pp. 15-51). London: Aslib.
Wilson, T. D. (1997). Information behavior: an interdisciplinary perspective. Information Processing & Management, 33(4), 551-572.
Zhang, Y. (1998). The impact of Internet-based electronic resources on formal scholarly communication in the area of library and information science: A citation analysis. Journal of Information Science, 24(4), 241-254. | zh_TW |