https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/24030
Title: | 四庫分纂稿、閣書提要和《總目》提要之內容比較分析—以集部為例 The Three Stage Process of Siku Quanshu Zongmu Tiyao: A Comparative Study of the Division of Collections |
Authors: | 段又瑄 Tuan, Yu-Hsuan |
Keywords: | 分纂稿;閣書提要;《四庫全書總目》提要;提要比較;集部提要;Siku Quanshu Zongmu tiyao;comparative study;annotations;annotated bibliography | Issue Date: | 2008 | Abstract: | 《四庫全書總目》(後文簡稱《總目》)是自《別錄》、《七略》後,存世目錄中較能兼顧敘錄體例之目錄。《總目》提要之內容介紹了圖書之作者與內容概要,發揮「辨章學術,考鏡源流」之功能,被視為是讀書治學之門徑,顯示其被看重之程度。《總目》經歷分纂稿的撰寫、閣書提要的修改,最後才成為定稿,三種提要之內容並非一致,引起研究者的注意。過去對《四庫全書》提要的比較研究,多偏重在分纂稿與《總目》提要,或是閣書提要與《總目》提要間的異同分析,故本研究著力於三種提要的比較分析,希望藉三種提要內容撰寫的差異與改變,更進一步瞭解提要的內涵與撰寫方法,為日後提要撰寫提供更多指引。前《四庫全書》中同時具有分纂稿、閣書提要和《總目》提要之圖書有368種,本研究則以集部之153種圖書的三種提要為樣本,因集部所具之三種提要數量為四部之冠,又所錄為文學著作,較能客觀檢視提要中內文,受學術門派、思想的影響較少,故本研究以集部為範圍,比對三種提要之內容,檢視其中差異。究將提要的內容略分為四大部分,書名、卷數及作者著作方式的記錄;作者生平爵里與事蹟的介紹;圖書內容、流傳情形之描述與考據;圖書或詩文得失的評價,對此進行分析比較。研究發現,各分纂官撰寫提要時未有一致的格式,至閣書提要才建立統一的書名、卷數著錄標準,與《總目》提要的內容亦較為接近。除分纂稿與閣本所據之本不同,使分纂稿與閣書提要、《總目》提要的內容差異較大或重新改寫外,多數分纂稿撰寫時,偏重於作者生平的介紹,而忽略圖書內容的描述與考證;或是記錄圖書所含之序跋、附錄諸文,卻未對作品優劣得失加以評議,多數未能兼顧提要之義例,因此幾乎各篇分纂稿皆受到增補與刪改。閣書提要以分纂稿為基礎,針對其內容不足之處,增補考述與評論,提供更多的資訊,敘述也較有條理。總目》提要則是針對閣書提要進行最後的修改潤飾,主要在作者生平的介紹、參考資料著錄及文句的潤飾上。《總目》提要貫徹執行「某人有某書,已著錄」之法,以省略重複之介紹文字。著錄參考資料時,較能清楚註記作者、書名,便利查檢參考、引述資料之來源。而《總目》提要潤改後的文句,與閣書提要之文意相去不遠,但文句更簡鍊,具有條理,閱讀更為通暢,因此《總目》提要與閣書提要於文字敘述上略有差異。過比較分析顯示,提要撰寫經過分纂稿到閣書提要,再至《總目》提要而成為定稿,中間經過修改、增補與潤飾,使得《總目》提要的體例更為齊備,提供讀者更為豐富的資訊;因此以三種提要的刪改過程為鑑,對日後撰寫提要作出建議。 Siku Quanshu Zongmu(《四庫全書總目》) has been the most well-known annotated bibliography in China since the late 18th century. It is highly valued by scholars and is considered as a research guide for students and scholars who study Chinese classics. Zongmu is comprised of annotations (tiyao,提要). The completion of each annotation is basically a three-stage process. First, a scholar is assigned to write the first draft annotation (so called fenzuan gao,分纂稿) for a book. Then, the draft is revised or re-written to become an introductory annotation (so called geshu tiyao,閣書提要). At last, all the introductory annotations are further revised or modified and put together to form the Zongmu tiyaoes. Due to the three-stage process, researchers have found that the contents of these three kinds of annotations are not exactly the same. Also, some comparative studies have been conducted to explore the differences among these annotations. It is the goal of this study to further examine the differences and changes of these three annotations during the transformation process.he researcher first collects book samples whose draft annotations, introductory annotations, and Zongmu tiyaoes are simultaneously extant. This sample is consisted of 368 books. Because the researcher intends to focus on books belonging to the literature division, the sample is reduced to 153 books. Among the 153 books, the three annotations of each book are thoroughly and explicitly analyzed and compared. The comparison is mainly focused on the following four aspects: (1) the recording format of title and volume, (2) matters related to the book’s author and its publishing condition, (3) matters about the contents of the book, and (4) the critique or value judgment of the book. |
URI: | http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw//handle/246246/179670 |
Appears in Collections: | 圖書資訊學系 |
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
ntu-97-R94126009-1.pdf | 23.53 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.