|dc.contributor.author||MATTHEW HUEI-MING MA||en|
|dc.creator||Lin, Y.-Y. and Chiang, W.-C. and Hsieh, M.-J. and Sun, J.-T. and Chang, Y.-C. and Ma, M.H.-M.||-|
|dc.description.abstract||Aim This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the effect of video-assistance and audio-assistance on quality of dispatcher-instructed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DI-CPR) for bystanders. Methods Five databases were searched, including PubMed, Cochrane library, Embase, Scopus and NIH clinical trial, to find randomized control trials published before June 2017. Qualitative analysis and meta-analysis were undertaken to examine the difference between the quality of video-instructed and audio-instructed dispatcher-instructed bystander CPR. Results The database search yielded 929 records, resulting in the inclusion of 9 relevant articles in this study. Of these, 6 were included in the meta-analysis. Initiation of chest compressions was slower in the video-instructed group than in the audio-instructed group (median delay 31.5 s; 95% CI: 10.94–52.09). The difference in the number of chest compressions per minute between the groups was 19.9 (95% CI: 10.50–29.38) with significantly faster compressions in the video-instructed group than in the audio-instructed group (104.8 vs. 80.6). The odds ratio (OR) for correct hand positioning was 0.8 (95% CI: 0.53–1.30) when comparing the audio-instructed and video-instructed groups. The differences in chest compression depth (mm) and time to first ventilation (seconds) between the video-instructed group and audio-instructed group were 1.6 mm (95% CI: ?8.75, 5.55) and 7.5 s (95% CI: ?56.84, 71.80), respectively. Conclusions Video-instructed DI-CPR significantly improved the chest compression rate compared to the audio-instructed method, and a trend for correctness of hand position was also observed. However, this method caused a delay in the commencement of bystander-initiated CPR in the simulation setting. ? 2017 Elsevier B.V.||-|
|dc.source||AH-Scopus to ORCID||-|
|dc.subject.other||Article; assisted ventilation; audio assisted dispatcher instructed bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation; hand; health care quality; human; intermethod comparison; meta analysis; practice guideline; priority journal; quality control; randomized controlled trial (topic); resuscitation; systematic review; time; video assisted dispatcher instructed bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation; emergency health service; emergency medical dispatcher; heart massage; mobile phone; out of hospital cardiac arrest; procedures; resuscitation; time to treatment; videoconferencing; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation; Cell Phone; Emergency Medical Dispatcher; Emergency Medical Service Communication Systems; Heart Massage; Humans; Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Time-to-Treatment; Videoconferencing||-|
|dc.title||Quality of audio-assisted versus video-assisted dispatcher-instructed bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis||-|
|Appears in Collections:||醫學系|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.