Repository logo
  • English
  • 中文
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. College of Medicine / 醫學院
  3. School of Medicine / 醫學系
  4. Comparison and validation of International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria for diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic cancer in a Taiwanese cohort
 
  • Details

Comparison and validation of International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria for diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic cancer in a Taiwanese cohort

Journal
BMJ Open
Journal Volume
4
Journal Issue
8
Date Issued
2014
Author(s)
MING-CHU CHANG  
SHU-CHEN WEI  
I-SHIOW JAN  
CHING-YAO YANG  
PO-CHIN LIANG  
JAU-MIN WONG  
YU-WEN TIEN  
YU-TING CHANG  
DOI
10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005900
URI
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84920420782&doi=10.1136%2fbmjopen-2014-005900&partnerID=40&md5=a8fdc5d985d765dfea60ebbd8cf33081
https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/461754
Abstract
Objectives: The International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria (ICDC) designed to diagnosis autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) has been proposed recently. The diagnostic performance of ICDC has not been previously evaluated in diffuse-type and focal-type AIP, respectively, in comparison with the revised HISORt and Asian criteria in Taiwan. Design: Prospective, consecutive patient cohort. Setting: Largest tertiary referred centre hospital managing pancreatic disease in Taiwan. Participants: 188 patients with AIP and 130 with tissue proofed pancreatic adenocarcinoma were consecutively recruited. Interventions: The ICDC, as well as revised HISORt and Asian criteria, was applied for each participant. Each diagnostic criterion of ICDC was validated with special reference to levels 1 and 2 in diffuse-type and focal-type AIP. Outcomes: Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. Each diagnostic criterion of ICDC was validated with special reference to levels 1 and 2 in AIP and focal-type AIP. Results: The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of ICDC for all AIP were the best: 89.4%, 100% and 93.7%, respectively, in these three criteria. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of ICDC for focal-type AIP (84.9%, 100% and 93.8%) were also the best among these three criteria. The area under the curve of receiver-operator characteristic of ICDC was 0.95 (95% CI 0.92 to 0.97) in all AIP and 0.93 (95% CI 0.88 to 0.97) in focal-type AIP. Conclusions: The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of ICDC are higher than the revised HISORt and Asian criteria. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of each criterion are higher in diffuse-type AIP compared with focal-type AIP. Under the same specificity, the sensitivity and accuracy of ICDC are higher than other diagnostic criteria in focal-type AIP. ICDC has better diagnostic performance compared with previously proposed diagnostic criteria in diffuse-type and focal-type AIP.
SDGs

[SDGs]SDG3

Other Subjects
immunoglobulin G4; steroid; adult; aged; area under the curve; article; autoimmune pancreatitis; cholestasis; comparative study; diagnostic accuracy; diagnostic test accuracy study; drug response; drug withdrawal; female; follow up; histology; human; immunoglobulin blood level; international consensus diagnostic criteria; lacrimal gland; major clinical study; male; named inventories, questionnaires and rating scales; pancreas; pancreas adenocarcinoma; pancreas disease; prospective study; receiver operating characteristic; salivary gland; sensitivity and specificity; serology; steroid therapy; Taiwan; treatment response; validation study; adenocarcinoma; Autoimmune Diseases; consensus; differential diagnosis; middle aged; Pancreatic Neoplasms; pancreatitis; Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Area Under Curve; Autoimmune Diseases; Consensus; Diagnosis, Differential; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pancreatitis; Prospective Studies; ROC Curve; Sensitivity and Specificity
Type
journal article

臺大位居世界頂尖大學之列,為永久珍藏及向國際展現本校豐碩的研究成果及學術能量,圖書館整合機構典藏(NTUR)與學術庫(AH)不同功能平台,成為臺大學術典藏NTU scholars。期能整合研究能量、促進交流合作、保存學術產出、推廣研究成果。

To permanently archive and promote researcher profiles and scholarly works, Library integrates the services of “NTU Repository” with “Academic Hub” to form NTU Scholars.

總館學科館員 (Main Library)
醫學圖書館學科館員 (Medical Library)
社會科學院辜振甫紀念圖書館學科館員 (Social Sciences Library)

開放取用是從使用者角度提升資訊取用性的社會運動,應用在學術研究上是透過將研究著作公開供使用者自由取閱,以促進學術傳播及因應期刊訂購費用逐年攀升。同時可加速研究發展、提升研究影響力,NTU Scholars即為本校的開放取用典藏(OA Archive)平台。(點選深入了解OA)

  • 請確認所上傳的全文是原創的內容,若該文件包含部分內容的版權非匯入者所有,或由第三方贊助與合作完成,請確認該版權所有者及第三方同意提供此授權。
    Please represent that the submission is your original work, and that you have the right to grant the rights to upload.
  • 若欲上傳已出版的全文電子檔,可使用Open policy finder網站查詢,以確認出版單位之版權政策。
    Please use Open policy finder to find a summary of permissions that are normally given as part of each publisher's copyright transfer agreement.
  • 網站簡介 (Quickstart Guide)
  • 使用手冊 (Instruction Manual)
  • 線上預約服務 (Booking Service)
  • 方案一:臺灣大學計算機中心帳號登入
    (With C&INC Email Account)
  • 方案二:ORCID帳號登入 (With ORCID)
  • 方案一:定期更新ORCID者,以ID匯入 (Search for identifier (ORCID))
  • 方案二:自行建檔 (Default mode Submission)
  • 方案三:學科館員協助匯入 (Email worklist to subject librarians)

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science