DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
dc.contributor | Department of History, National Taiwan University | en |
dc.contributor | 國立臺灣大學歷史學系 | zh |
dc.contributor.author | 王世宗 | zh-TW |
dc.creator | 王世宗 | - |
dc.creator | Wang, S.T. | en |
dc.date | 2007-06 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-09-11T04:15:07Z | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-05-29T03:26:48Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-09-11T04:15:07Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-05-29T03:26:48Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2007-06 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1012-8514 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw//handle/246246/283006 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw/bitstream/246246/283006/1/0039_200706_7.pdf | - |
dc.description.abstract | This research aims to expound the Liberal Party's attitude and policy towards the establishment of the Uganda protectorate in the mid-1890s, thereby revealing the conflict and reconciliation between modem liberalism and imperialism. This study examines five points at issue: 1. Uganda and East Africa in the perspective of British imperial strategy; 2. The Uganda Question as a test of the Liberals’ formulae on imperial politics, esp. Gladstonianism and Roseberianism; 3. The Uganda Question in the context of home and international politics; 4. The Uganda business under the Rosebery Government from 1894 to 1895; 5. The solution of the Uganda Question and its impacts upon "Liberal Imperialism" in practice. In general, these issues explain the way-however different from that of the Conservatives-the Liberals contributed to the expansion of the British Empire. This treatise shows that the annexation of Uganda was a cheap enterprise, and that the "New Imperialism" in the late nineteenth century was to a great extent a byproduct of European power politics based upon a sophisticated nation-state system. More often than not, therefore, prestige mattered more than "material" things in the decision-making of foreign policy, as popular politics was rapidly taking shape in the first Western democracies. A forward policy in Africa might not always be preferable for the Liberals, yet a policy of retreat was never endorsed. So, the controversies over Uganda had, after all, little effect on the advance of the British West African empire. | en |
dc.description.abstract | 本論文探討的主題為英國自由黨對於1892至1895年間有關烏干達保護地設置問題的政策立場,以及由此所反映的自由主義與帝國主義理念之調和與衝突。烏干達問題的出現及難處,在於英國取得當地治權的容易隊及經營當地的耗費過鉅,在無嚴重的列弦威脅與土著挑戰之下,烏干達問題更能彰顯英國帝國主義的原始性與特殊性,而這個問題對於自由黨的「保守主義化」或「帝國主義化」,也引發根本的反省與巨大的影響。據此,本研究重點包括:一、烏干達在大英帝國的東非擴張計畫中所具有的地位與重要性,以及烏干達問題作為埃及問題延伸的表現;二、烏干達問題爭議所導致的英國自由黨意識形態與政策路線之分裂,此即是有關格蘭斯敦主義(Gladstoinianism)與羅斯柏理主義(Roseberianism)的交替問題;三、烏干達問題在十九世紀末期英國政黨政治與列弦帝國衝突情勢中,所呈現的特質與所造成的衝擊;四、羅斯柏理執政下,烏干達問題的解決方案及其對於自由主義新取向的影響;五、烏干達問題所表現的「自由派帝國主義」在理念與實踐之間的落差。這個研究探討「新帝國主義」(The New Imperialism, 1871-1914)追求國家榮耀而不計現實經濟利害的精神性意涵,隊此顯示一般左派學者討論帝國擴張或殖民主義的「盲點」,並說明近代自由主義因應複雜而密切的人際與國際關係時,所做的調整及其成敗得失。 | zh |
dc.format.extent | 29790691 bytes | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.language | en | - |
dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
dc.relation | 臺大歷史學報, 39, 315-367 | - |
dc.relation | 臺大歷史學報, 39, 315-367 | en |
dc.relation.ispartof | 臺大歷史學報 | - |
dc.subject | 自由黨 | - |
dc.subject | 烏干達 | - |
dc.subject | 格蘭斯敦 | - |
dc.subject | 羅斯柏理 | - |
dc.subject | 埃及 | - |
dc.subject | 英屬東非公司 | - |
dc.subject | 波特 | - |
dc.subject | Liberal Party | - |
dc.subject | Uganda | - |
dc.subject | Gladstone | - |
dc.subject | Rosebery | - |
dc.subject | IBEA | - |
dc.subject | liberalism | - |
dc.subject | Portal | - |
dc.subject.classification | [SDGs]SDG16 | - |
dc.title | 烏干達問題與英國自由派帝國主義的發展,1892~95 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Proclaiming a Protectorate over Uganda: The Liberal Party and Late Victorian Empire, 1892-95 | en |
dc.type | journal article | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6253/ntuhistory.2007.39.07 | - |
dc.identifier.url | http://dx.doi.org/10.6253/ntuhistory.2007.39.07 | - |
item.fulltext | with fulltext | - |
item.grantfulltext | open | - |
dc.relation.pages | 315-367 | - |
dc.relation.journalissue | 39 | - |
dc.identifier.uri.fulltext | http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw/bitstream/246246/283006/1/0039_200706_7.pdf | - |
item.fulltext | with fulltext | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
item.openairetype | journal article | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | en_US | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | - |
item.grantfulltext | open | - |
crisitem.author.orcid | 0000-0001-8152-6511 | - |
顯示於: | 歷史學系
|