2008-08-012024-05-18https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/706342摘要：我國公法學界，向來因受德、日兩國影響，習將行政爭訟制度與國家賠償制度，分別稱為「第一次權利保護」與「第二次權利保護」；然而相對於這種權利保護之「第一次性」與「第二次性」的用語，行政爭訟與國家賠償之間究竟有何具體的關聯性，則始終存在許多爭議，而未曾完全釐清。準此，正鑑於我國國家賠償法迄今施行已逾17年，而行政爭訟制度之大幅革新也已近8年，本研究計畫即擬從比較法學之觀點，參考德國、日本，乃至歐洲法近年來的新學說與新實務，重新由憲法與行政法等兩個層面，深入討論第一次權利保護與第二次權利保護之間，在實體法與程序法領域分別所呈現的各種關係。其中，例如：「權利侵害」作為啟動兩個制度之共同核心概念的概念內涵究竟如何，過咎責任與無過咎責任之於權利保護有何意義，結果除去請求權在第一次權利保護與第二次權利保護等兩個制度之間如何定位，以及所謂「第一次權利保護優先性」原則，對於行政爭訟程序與國家賠償訴訟之順位關係有何影響等法釋義學的基礎性議題，均屬本研究計畫的重點。總之，基於憲法上「有權利即有救濟」的誡命，我國現行法應如何從解釋論，乃至立法論，建立完整而有效的權利保護體系，將是本研究計畫的最終研究目的。<br> Abstract: The public law scholars in Taiwan have long been influenced by German and Japanese theories and are used to identify administrative litigation system and state liability system with “premier legal remedy” and “secondary legal remedy.” Except the clear distinction on the terms of “premier” and “secondary,” the correlations between administrative litigation system and state liability system, however, remains controversial and is barely clarified. In view of that State Compensation Act has come into effect for 17 years, and that the administrative litigation system was drastically revised for nearly 8 years, this research project will adopt comparative jurisprudential method and refer to new scholarly theories and court practices of Germany, Japan and even European law, particularly from different angels of constitution and administrative law, discussing the correlations between premier legal remedy and secondary legal remedy which emerge respectively out of substantive law and procedural law. For instances herein, what does “infringement of right” indicate which plays the same dominant role in two systems and also triggers both? What do the concepts of “liability of fault” and “liability without fault” mean to legal remedies? How should “the claim to nullification of consequences” be defined in premier and secondary legal remedy systems? And how “the principle of priority of premier legal remedy” affects the sequence between the procedure of administrative litigation and the litigation of state liability? These are fundamental issues in dogmatics of law and the key points of this study. In a nutshell, based on the constitutional order, ubi ius ibi remedium, It is the purpose of this research project to study how to establish complete and effective legal remedy system de lege lata and even de lege ferenda in our current legal system.第一次權利保護第二次權利保護行政爭訟國家賠償premier legal remedysecondary legal remedyadministrative litigationstate liability