2018-08-012024-05-14https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/660732摘要：在公民與政治權利國際公約及經濟社會文化權利國際公約（以下簡稱兩公約）經過批准以及兩公約施行法正式生效之後，其對國家產生之拘束力不僅限於立法以及行政，而及於司法。若國際人權公約所保障之權利遭受侵害而無法於內國法院主張予以實現時，則該公約之精神及規範目的將流於空談。於此之下，觀察我國司法機關如何藉由裁判實踐兩公約即具有其重要性及研究價值。 詳言之，本研究旨在整理及分析自兩公約規範國內法化以來我國法院如何適用兩公約，並且基此評價我國法院是否正確適用兩公約，以進一步提出法院解釋適用上之建議。 <br> Abstract: Since the promulgation of the Act to Implement the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, national courts in Taiwan, not different from the Executive and the Legislative Branches, is bound to implement the most significant human rights treaties of the 20th century. However, If individuals, in cases of human rights violations, cannot take legal actions in national courts, those human rights are merely pretty words on paper. From this aspect, it is of research value to observe and analyze the legal practice of Taiwanese courts regarding applications of human rights covenants. This project is focused on the analysis of relevant court decisions and aims at a proper evaluation and critique.兩公約內國法院判決International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights：International Covenant on Economic Social and Cultural Rightsnational court decisions