國立臺灣大學政治學系Department of Political Science, National Taiwan University石之瑜Shih, C.Y.C.Y.Shih2017-09-082018-06-282017-09-082018-06-282000-12http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw//handle/246246/281687中共官方的大國關係論，在海峽兩岸各自刺激出多種不同回應，在臺灣，有結構現實主義對大國外交的格局進行客觀分析，有古典現實主義由中共國家利益與國力的角色進行政策分析；在大陸，有以對外交流合作為主調的政策主張，也有面向國內力保開放潮流的自由化立場。臺灣學者覺得大國外交製造中國威脅，大陸學者認為大國外交是用妥協來化解中國威脅。故對臺灣而言，大國外交論述下的中共國家權力威脅，成為潛在的研究動機，乃傾向於對「外交」部分更重視；而在大陸，大國外交論述卻是屬於保護改革政策的一個外交立場，從而對於如何做一個「大國」的部分更加重視。大國外交是什麼，必須在各家討論的問題意識中來詮釋。研究者本身所處的情境，影響到研究成果所帶有的政策意涵。This paper reviews the literature on "China's big-power diplomacy" in Taiwan as well as China. From the realist traditions, the literature in Taiwan is concerned with how big-power diplomacy may help improve China's power status in the world and affect Taiwan. In contrast, the Chinese literature witnesses a debate between idealism and realism and involves a quest for the meaning of China being a big power. On the whole, those who in China conceive of big-power diplomacy as a useful political discourse caution against militant policy toward Taiwan. The paper argues that there is a clear cognitive cleavage between the two streams of literature in terms of the meaning of big-power diplomacy.中共外交；大國外交；兩岸關係；現實主義；理想主義；Chinese foreign policy；big-power diplomacy；cross-Strait relations；realism；idealismjournal article