郭斯傑2006-07-252018-07-092006-07-252018-07-092005http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw//handle/246246/2904由於國內營造工程的規模漸趨龐大，工程中分工與介面的關係也越來越複雜， 過去傳統的由承包商自行投保方式產生了諸多的問題，為了有效解決這些問題，乃 有業主主控保險計畫（OCIP）的興起。本研究除收集國內有業主主控保險計畫經 驗的台北捷運局實際統保資料進行探討外。另一方面，鑒於統合設計與施工的統包 觀念與作法，近年來逐漸為國內工程業主單位接受及採用，然而大型工程在採行統 包制度時，實務上所遭遇之工程保險問題探討，在國內相關的研究並不多見。因此 本研乃蒐集整理國外有關統包制度下工程保險相關文獻，同時也藉由同時實施「統 包」及「統保」制度之高雄捷運工程進行調查，以了解其執行現況及進行相關問題 探討。With multiple interfaces in large-scale construction, traditional insurance approach that the contractor purchase and maintain adequate insurance coverage is not the best choice in integration construction risks. By comparison, under an OCIP, the owner providing insurance coverage to the contractor, subcontractors, and design-departments is a considerable approach. This research collects the real data of OCIP from Department of Taipei Rapid Transit, to discuss this type of innovative risk-transfer methodology. Also, there has been an increasing interest by owners over the last few years to use integrated risk management to augment the benefits of design-build project delivery on construction projects. However, current researches lack an overall analysis on the actualities of design-build project with construction insurance. Accordingly, this research reviews related literature and investigates the reality and potential problems in designbuild project with OCIP by the case of Kaohsiung Rapid Transit Project.application/pdf173325 bytesapplication/pdfzh-TW國立臺灣大學土木工程學系暨研究所工程保險統包業主主控保險計畫construction insurancedesign-buildowner controlled insurance programs (OCIP)reporthttp://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw/bitstream/246246/2904/1/932211E002056.pdf