2008-08-012024-05-17https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/682779摘要：本計畫是作為我近年探討東亞王權的研究課題的重要一環。東亞王權的特色是農業王權。表達這個農業王權理念的代表性典籍是《周禮》。故我們可以稱古代皇帝制度的政體形態為「周禮國家」。本計畫擬從《周禮》一書的詮釋與運用出發，說明其中以農業王權為主軸的相關學說如何成為中國皇帝制度的信念。其次，探討這套「以農立國」的農民與農業思想如何成為皇帝制度的政策，如戶令與屯田。再者，探討這套「周禮國家」的理念如何傳播到東亞諸國，主要是指日本列島與朝鮮半島上的諸國，尤其環繞在日本古代「律令制」的成立。最後，此計畫延續我前二年的「東亞王權與儒教：儒家經典詮釋中的祭祀國家原理」，希望能將東亞王權放在一個世界史的脈絡中，試著從禮制、農業與漢字的觀點，探討「世界帝國」的普遍性與中國、東亞的特殊性。<br> Abstract: The major object of this proposal is to figure out the polity of East Asian kingships. East Asian Empires was characterized by the rural kingship, which had legitimacy from the discourse of Rites of Zhou, and could be defined as polity of Zhou-li. First, I will argue how Chinese Confucian scholars built up the discourse of rural kingship by appropriating the ideas of Rites of Zhou and other Confucian classics, such as Mencius. The second topic will be the dilemma of Chinese Emperorship which menas that rural society could not exit by itself without the support of commerce. It is interesting to illustrate how Chinese scholars used Confucian hermeneutics to assume the rural society and rural kingship. In the same time, we could have a whole new perspective to draw the new picture of Chinese history. Last, I will figure out how Japanese Kingship applyed the polity of Zhou-li in the making of ancient empire This program will be executed for three years. One year is for Japanese history, the second for Chinese history, and the third for the comparison between Japanese and Chinese kingships, re-exploring the complex of Chineseness vs. local knowledge in Ancient East Asia.周禮儒教王權東亞史皇帝制度天皇制農業王權Rites of ZhouConfucianismEast Asian historyPolity of Huang-diPolity of Tennoagricultural empire