蘇德勝臺灣大學:職業醫學與工業衛生研究所吳姵穎Wu, Pei-YingPei-YingWu2010-05-112018-06-292010-05-112018-06-292008U0001-0901200817172200http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw//handle/246246/182261建立與推動良好安全衛生管理制度，以達成持續改善並減少職業災害發生之目標，必要倚重可靠權重指標，用以量測安全衛生管理業務之落實度。而本研究的目的主要在探討專家人員與業界工安人員在安全衛生指標權重配分之認知差異性，並於個案公司方式執行該安全衛生指標，以探討該量表之適用性與可行性。研究收集國內外相關文獻歸納整理後，擇其重點與推動經驗，設計「我國安全衛生績效指標權重之調查研究」問卷，並徵詢33位專家意見後完成問卷設計修正。調查問卷發放給針對609位業界工業安全衛生人員及32位某個案公司主管，進行安全衛生績效評估之結構性問卷調查。卷中之各項安全衛生績效指標「重要性」與「可行性」之趨勢調查中發現：在職業災害指標中，「職災傷害嚴重率」之重要性與可行性皆最高；在損失事故指標中，以「總合災害損失指數」之重要性最高，「失能傷害損失日數」之可行性最高；在安全衛生狀態指標中，「健檢資料」重要性與可行性最高；在安全衛生管理指標中，「安全衛生政策是否充份宣導」之重要性最高，「附近居民或群眾抗議次數」之可行性最高；在安全衛生操作指標中，「執行安全衛生稽核建議所需時間」之重要性最高，「是否有指派安全衛生負責人」之可行性最高。十項安全衛生管理主要績效指標之各項權重配分調查結果如下：「安全衛生政策與願景」為10分；「安全衛生目標規劃」為10分；「顧客、社區滿意度」為7分、「管理階層審查」為9分；「風險評估與事故預防措施」為10分；「審查稽核與績效評量」為11分；「安全衛生組織、訓練與輔導」為11分；「緊急應變與事故處理」為10分、「安全衛生作業管制」為12分；「安全衛生作業操作」為10分。研究彙整專家人員與工業安全衛生人員對於我國安全衛生績效指標權重配分研究調查結果，發展出「我國安全衛生績效指標權重量表」。實際應用於某個案公司的研究結果，初步驗證此量表的實用性。To build a good management system for work safety and health, appropriate weighing index should be taken to measure the management of safety and health for the good of continual improvement in the occupational accident. This study aimed to investigate the difference in the weighting factors for safety and health indices assigned by experts and field industrial hygienists, repectively. This study also took a case company to explore the feasibility of these weighing factors for industrial safety and health performance indices used in Taiwan.hrough liferatual review of the relevant domestic and overseas resources, a self-administered questionnaire was developed. After consulting with thirty-three experts, the preliminary weighing factors for the safety and health performance indices in the questionnaire were obtained. The structured questionnaire was admimstered to 606 industrial safety professor and 32 directors of a case company and to evaluate the safety and health performance at their own workplaces. or the indices of occupational accident, the importance and feasibility of injury severity was the highest. For the work-loss incident indices, the importance of total loss days was the highest, and the disabling loss days was the highest in feasibility. For the indices of work safety and health, phyical examination was of the hightest importance and feasibility. For the indices of safety and health management, weather the policy of safety and health having been widely disseminated advocated was of the highest importance, and how many times of protest from adjacent residents were rank the highest in feasibility. In the indices for safety operation, the time interval of audit was of the highest importance, and the whether a safety and health mamager being assigned was the highest in feasibility.he resulted weighing factors for ten performance indices for safety and health were as follows: 10 for policy and vision of safety and health, 10 for object setting for safety and health, 7 for customers and neighborhood satisfaction, 9 for the management review, 10 for risk assessment and accident prevention measures, 11 for review audit and performance evaluation, 11 for safety and health organization, training and mentoring, 10 for emergency response and event handing, 12 for operational control for safety and health, 10 for job safety and health operation.ccording to the survey of “Study on Occupational Safety and Health Performance Index in Taiwan”, “Weighing Factors for Occupational Safety and Health Performance Indices in Taiwan” was developed and demonstrated practicable in field safety and health performance assessment in the case company pilot study.目錄要 Ⅰbstract Ⅲ錄 Ⅴ目錄 Ⅸ目錄 XII一章 緒論.1研究背景與動機 1.2研究目的 3二章 文獻探討.1職業安全衛生管理系統 4.2職業安全衛生績效評估 5.2.1主動式績效評估量測 6.2.2被動式績效評估量測 8 2.2.3 主動式績效量測指標與被動式績效量測指標之結合……… 10三章 研究方法與材料.1研究設計與流程 14.1.1問卷編製之內容 15.2效度與信度分析 16.2.1效度分析 16.2.2信度分析 17.3 德爾菲法(Delphi Method)專家問卷 19.4個案研究方法 20.5資料處理與統計分析 20四章 結果與討論.1研究範圍與限制 23.1.1研究範圍 23.1.2研究限制 23.2研究對象之基本資料 23.2.1 專家人員資料分析 23.2.2 業界工安人員資料分析 25.2.3個案公司資料分析 29.2.3.1個案公司背景說明 29.2.3.2個案公司基本資料分析 30.3問卷結果整理 30.3.1第一回德爾菲「我國安全衛生績效指標權重調查」問卷 30.3.2第二回德爾菲「我國安全衛生績效指標權重調查」問卷 31.4專家對安全衛生績效指標態度量表及共識性問卷結果之統計分析 31.4.1專家對各類別單項安全衛生績效指標重要性與可行性的態度析 31.4.2各類別職業安全衛生單項績效指標之重要性與可行性的共識析 38.5專家與業界工安人員對安全衛生績效指標重要性與可行性之態度較 42.5.1職業災害指標 42.5.2損失事故指標 44.5.3安全衛生狀態指標 46.5.4安全衛生管理指標 48.5.5安全衛生操作狀態指標 50.6各議題職業安全衛生績效指標之權重配分分析 53.6.1專家對安全衛生績效指標主議題及次議題配分布情形 53.6.2個案公司對安全衛生績效指標主議題與次議題權重配分結果 58.6.3專家人員與個案公司對安全衛生績效指標權重配分比較分析 63.6.3.1主要議題安全衛生績效指標權重之配分比較 63.6.3.2安全衛生績效之次議題權重指標配分之比較 64.7推動職業安全衛生績效指標與管理政策之統計分析 67.7.1實施安全衛生績效指標評鑑方式之調查結果 67.7.2安全衛生績效指標由業界內稽與評鑑機構複審外稽評分差改善政策之看法 69.7.3.將ILO-OSH2001、OHSAS18001納入勞動檢查項目以推動全衛生績效管理之可行性 70.7.4. 將ILO-OSH2001納入自主管理之重要性調查分析 71.7.5.安全衛生績效指標評估人員資格之調查分析 73.7.6製造業、營建業所使用之安全衛生績效指標之比較分析 75.7.7 OHSAS18000及ILO-OSH2001納入於我國安全衛生法以推動全為衛生績效之調查分析 75.7.8將OHSAS18000、ILO -OSH2001、ISO14000、ISO9000共同何之可行性調查分析 76五章 結論與建議.1結論 78.2 後續研究建議 80考文獻錄一、專家名單 87錄二、第一次專家問卷德爾菲問卷彙整表(一) (二) 88錄三、第一回德爾菲「我國安全衛生績效指標權重調查」問卷 90錄四、第二次德爾菲「我國安全衛生績效指標權重調查」 97錄五、「我國安全衛生績效指標權重調查」工業安全衛生人員問卷…106錄六、我國安全衛生績效指標權重量表 114application/pdf990807 bytesapplication/pdfen-US職業安全衛生管理安全衛生績效安全衛生指標occupational safety and health managementperformance index for safety and healththesishttp://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw/bitstream/246246/182261/1/ntu-97-R93841022-1.pdf