Hsu W.-KCHUNG-KEE YEH2022-04-252022-04-25202119961073https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85109016160&doi=10.3390%2fen14123702&partnerID=40&md5=58311eb29959d616a1ec6d04f499d4c2https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/605923In this study, we present the wind distributions from a long-term offshore met mast and a novel approach based on the measure–correlate–predict (MCP) method from short-term onshore-wind-turbine data. The annual energy production (AEP) and capacity factors (CFs) of one onshore and four offshore wind-turbine generators (WTG) available on the market are evaluated on the basis of wind-distribution analysis from both the real met mast and the MCP method. Here, we also consider the power loss from a 4-month light detection and ranging (LiDAR) power-curve test on an onshore turbine to enhance the accuracy of further AEP and CF evaluations. The achieved Weibull distributions could efficiently represent the probability distribution of wind-speed variation, mean wind speed (MWS), and both the scale and shape parameters of Weibull distribution in Taiwan sites. The power-loss effect is also considered when calculating the AEPs and CFs of different WTGs. Successful offshore wind development requires (1) quick, accurate, and economical harnessing of a wind resource and (2) selection of the most suitable and efficient turbine for a specific offshore site. ? 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.Annual energy production (AEP)Capacity factors (CFs)Light detection and ranging (LiDAR)Mean wind speed (MWS)Measure–correlate–predict (MCP)Wind-turbine generator (WTG)Offshore oil well productionOptical radarWeibull distributionWindWind powerAnnual energy productionsCapacity factorsLight detection and rangingMean wind speedOnshore wind turbineScale and shape parametersWind distributionWind speed variationsOffshore wind turbinesOffshore wind potential of west central Taiwan: A case studyjournal article10.3390/en141237022-s2.0-85109016160