CHUNG-LI DULai C.-F.Wang J.-D.2020-03-102020-03-1020070929-6646https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-37349104949&doi=10.1016%2fS0929-6646%2808%2960058-3&partnerID=40&md5=ec03a103c08d88384bb437ac69b6884ahttps://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/475252Background/purpose: Occupational injury of the upper extremities account for 24% of occupational injuries in Taiwan. However, studies on the timing and factors influencing retum-to-work is lacking. Methods: A total of 102 hospitalized workers with non-severe upper extremity fractures, defined as without avulsion, amputation and nerve damage, were interviewed over the telephone using a structured questionnaire at 45, 90 and 180 days after injury. Results: After controlling other factors, cases with other-than-digit fracture presented three-fold more difficulty than those with digit fracture on returning to work (OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.17-0.63). Male workers (OR, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.16-6.25) and those with financial help from their employer (OR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.17-4.60) found it easier to return to work 90 days after injury. There were 32% who were still unable to return to work 180 days after injury. Conclusion: Women workers and workers without financial help from employers are at a disadvantage with regard to early return-to-work. Other assistance besides medical treatment could be of significant help but should be cautiously exercised in extrapolating to workers who are not the main breadwinner in their household. ? 2007 Elsevier & Formosan Medical Association.[SDGs]SDG3adult; arm fracture; article; controlled study; female; female worker; finger fracture; health care cost; health insurance; hospital patient; human; interview; major clinical study; male; occupational accident; structured questionnaire; work resumptionjournal article10.1016/S0929-6646(08)60058-3180635092-s2.0-37349104949