2012-08-012024-05-17https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/678693摘要：文明是繁複而叢結的傳遞過程，必須仰賴個體的能動者為載體，而學術文本介乎其間， 不但就此過程加以聯繫記錄，並促成重生再造，成為多種潛在可能性的源起。然而，對英語文獻之外的各種在地學術文本而言，所具有的傳遞與再造作用卻罕為外界所知悉。本項五年研究計畫的開展，乃在藉由各種具備世界在地性的文本所體現的差異，蒐羅中國研究的知識史中關於文明過程的困境與機緣，整理其中的限制和可能性，以及因此所蘊釀出尚不為人知的諸多全球意象。準此，不論是在全球或區域的範疇下，中國研究的成果均不能單純視為是一個單一實體的各個面向，故而也就不宜滿足於僅僅是將外界對所謂中國的回應或體驗，當成只是不同面貌的多元一體。儘管某種具有霸權性質的全球秩序，始終無所不在的制約並組織各個在地的中國論述，但世界不可能完全順從於任何單一秩序。若能強調知識的在地世界性，進而揭示知識和經驗實乃屬於情境的產物，勢必便應該呼喚與各知識社群根深蒂固的無數地緣文化建立聯繫。與本計畫尤其相關的是，在地世界的文明過程及其學術構成深刻影響著、並受制於對中國的研究文本。隨著2002年以降各項中國學知識社群的先驅計畫與口述歷史計畫全面鋪展，本項五年計畫本著同樣的基礎研究精神，預計繼續對各國尤其是中國週邊後殖民社會的資深中國學者，但亦將因緣延伸至歐洲各地社群，進行口述歷史訪談，且對訪談文本與學術文本進行敘事與內容分析，同時在語言能力許可的前提下，開展系列的學位論文寫作計畫，記錄、整理與歸納近、當代中國研究的個別學者如何在各自的文明基礎上，充滿策略動能地選擇所欲歸屬的知識脈絡。<br> Abstract: Between civilizational complexities and their individual agents, scholarly texts are both liaisons and genesis that are full of possibilities. However, this is not particularly clear outside the English literature. The proposed five year project gather the problems and the promises of difference in the study of China and Chinese civilization by examining the limits and possibilities of distinct forms of Worlding and the global imaginaries they give rise to. China studies are not about a single global/regional reality that is experienced and responded to in different ways. While one form of global order might be hegemonic in particular registers, the world does not conform to this single version. An emphasis on Worlding brings to light the situatedness of knowledge and experience, and constitutes a call for re-connecting to their particular anchorings in myriad geocultural sites. Of special relevance to this project is the academic constitution of civilizations and their Worlding as they impact as well as proceed upon China studies. Following the steps of its various predecessors since 2002, this five year project will continue, upon the thrust of basic research, to conduct discursive analysis and content analysis of oral history of the senior China scholars all over the world, but especially over those neighboring postcolonial communities, with occasional extensions to various European communities, and develop projects to record, recollect, and induct the evolution of historical as well as contemporary literature on China pertaining to its civilizational underpinnings and individual scholars’ contextualized choices, depending on the language capacity of those who will join the project as the time goes on.