2007-08-012024-05-18https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/702052摘要：本計畫擬以二年期間（2007年8月至2009年7月）至北東南亞寮國Luang Namtha與Muang Sing兩鎮區，進行Tai-Lue人「族群生命史」的研究。研究人員將從兩地（前者僅一村，後者有十數村）Lue人的族群移動過程，探討族群性根植的要因及其外現的樣態，再從中以「族群生命史」之概念，說明內造與外顯之族群屬性與歷史經驗、歷史觀、或日常生活中之歷史判準息息相關。 族群性的「內造性」或「內構性」，依本人之見，係指一個族群將「歷史」內化成當下生活內容，從生活內容中，我們不僅可發現「歷史」，也可將這些「歷史」視成族群之所以為族群的基礎。當然「歷史」內容可能隨族群遷移產生變化，它亦會直接影響生活內容的構成。總之，內造／內構的族群性，係以「歷史內容」與「生活內容」辯證關係過程為據，它存在於人們內在思維、族內言談，及日常起居之中。至於族群性的「外創性」或「外現性」係指國家的族群分類系統、國家文化的建造、國際觀光及區域化之經濟模式等要素衝擊下，族群為與外在環境配合而顯於外的樣態形貌。內外造現過程均為族群生命史的一環。內造／內構的族群性必定存在，但外創／外現的族群性則不必然存在或不必然非存在不可。本研究計畫即欲以三年兩鎮區Tai-Lue人為田野實例，充分說明上述之論點。 本人期望藉此發展出人類學民族誌「族群生命史」方法論，以及歷史人類學與族群理論合為共通解釋模型的可能性。 <br> Abstract: In this project, I plan to spend three years to study the Lue in both Luang Namtha and Muang Sing where are located in northern Laos. I would suggest to adopt the methodology of “ethnic life history” to analyze the three villages that the project will cover. There is only one Lue village in Luang Namtha area, but there are more than ten in Muang Sing township. The Lue as “minority” and as ‘majority” indicates different modes of expressing ethnicity from the internal roots and external performances. I would maintain that ethnicity definitely has close relationships with historical experiences, historical consciousness and history sense in daily life. I expect to develop a model of integrating anthropology of history and theory of ethnicity in order to establish an approach of analyzing ethnic-state and “independent” village as various groups of the Lue found many places in northern southeast Asia. The “inner-creation” or “inner-construction” of ethnicity, in my view, refers to the way an ethnic group internalize “history” into immediate content of daily life. From the content of daily life, we can not only find “history”, but also view “history” as the foundation of an ethnic group’s formation. The content of “history”, of course, may change along with ethnic migration. It may also directly affect the composition of living content. In short, the ethnicity of inner-creation/ inner-construction is based on the dialectical process of “historical content” and “living content”, which exists in people’s intrinsic thought, inner-ethnic conversation, and daily life. As for the ethnicity of “outer-creation” or “outer-expression” refers to the expressive form of an ethnic group which coordinate with the outer environment under the collision of a nation’s ethnic classification system, national cultural construction, international tourism and regional economic model etc.. Both the processes of inner and outer construction are part of ethnic life history. The ethnicity of inner-creation/ inner-construction certainly exist, however, the ethnicity of outer-creation/ outer-expression does not necessarily or inevitably exist. This three-year research project tries to take the fieldwork of two townships, Luang Namtha and Muang Sing, as examples to fully explain the arguments above.北東南亞鎮區泐人族群生命史族群性遷移與定根歷史記憶宗教信仰村落意識northern southeast AsiaLue in townshipethnic life historyethnicitymigration & rootedness