PO-DA CHENCHAO-YING WUREY-HENG HUWEI-HAN CHOUHONG-SHIEE LAIJIN-TUNG LIANGPO-HUANG LEEYAO-MING WU2019-11-182019-11-182017-041068-9265https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/431425Robotic hepatectomy has been suggested to be a safe and effective approach for liver disease; however, studies comparing robotic hepatectomy with the conventional open approach regarding oncologic outcomes for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are limited. Accordingly, we performed a matched comparison of surgical and oncological outcomes between robotic and open hepatectomy.en[SDGs]SDG3adult; aged; Article; bile leakage; biloma; cancer staging; cancer surgery; cancer survival; chest infection; controlled study; disease free survival; female; human; intermethod comparison; length of stay; liver cell carcinoma; liver cirrhosis; liver resection; major clinical study; male; operation duration; overall survival; patient controlled analgesia; postoperative complication; postoperative hemorrhage; postoperative pain; retrospective study; robot assisted surgery; surgical infection; treatment outcome; comparative study; liver cell carcinoma; liver resection; liver tumor; middle aged; postoperative pain; procedures; propensity score; robotic surgical procedure; survival rate; very elderly; young adult; analgesic agent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Hepatectomy; Humans; Length of Stay; Liver Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Operative Time; Pain, Postoperative; Propensity Score; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Survival Rate; Young Adultjournal article10.1245/s10434-016-5638-9277781282-s2.0-84992183713WOS:000398047600027https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/84992183713