Kung Y.-WSu Y.-JSUE-HUEI CHEN2022-11-152022-11-15202208949867https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85124816260&doi=10.1002%2fjts.22788&partnerID=40&md5=ca9df3e010c6378d4d3e15a92cb9a98bhttps://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/625067The widely used Centrality of Event Scale (CES) measures the extent that a traumatic event serves as a central component of self-identity, a reference point, and a turning point in an individual's life story. The present study aimed to develop a Chinese version of the CES and assess its reliability, criterion validity, and factor structure. Data were collected from three samples of trauma-exposed Taiwanese individuals (N = 939), including 420 earthquake survivors, 300 trauma-exposed community adults, and 219 trauma-exposed undergraduate students. We conducted an exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis and compared the resulting models with a one-factor model and the originally proposed model. The results indicated that a new three-factor model, S-Bχ2(167, N = 519) = 687.01, p <.001, CFI =.95, IFI =.95, NNFI =.94, RMSEA =.078, SRMR =.047, might better represent the construct compared to the one-factor or originally proposed model. Furthermore, the Chinese CES demonstrated excellent internal consistency, Cronbach's αs =.89–.94; adequate 1-month reliability, rs =.54–.64, and 6-month temporal stability, rs =.52–.67; and good concurrent and predictive validity. The findings indicate that the Chinese version of the CES demonstrates good psychometric properties with a three-factor structure, and it could be used to assess event centrality among nonclinical trauma-exposed Taiwanese adults. © 2022 International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies.adult; China; factor analysis; human; multiple trauma; posttraumatic stress disorder; procedures; psychometry; questionnaire; reproducibility; Adult; China; Factor Analysis, Statistical; Humans; Multiple Trauma; Psychometrics; Reproducibility of Results; Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic; Surveys and Questionnairesjournal article10.1002/jts.22788351824412-s2.0-85124816260