Chang, Li-JunLi-JunChangHsiao, Chun-JenChun-JenHsiaoChen, BingBingChenLiu, Tzu-YuTzu-YuLiuDing, JuliaJuliaDingHsu, Wan-TingWan-TingHsuSu-Ortiz, VictorVictorSu-OrtizChen, Szu-TaSzu-TaChenSu, Ke-YingKe-YingSuWu, Han-PingHan-PingWuCHIEN-CHANG LEE2021-04-232021-04-232021-022054-4774https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/557832The primary aim is to provide a summary of evidence for the diagnostic accuracies of multiplex PCR gastrointestinal (GI) panels-BioFire FilmArray and Luminex xTAG on the detection of gastroenteritis pathogens. The secondary aim is to compare the performance of these GI panels head to head.enenteric infections; meta-analysis; real time PCR[SDGs]SDG3Clostridium difficile toxin A; acute gastroenteritis; adolescent; adult; aged; area under the curve; bacterium culture; Campylobacter; child; clinical evaluation; Clostridioides difficile; controlled study; Cryptosporidium; diagnostic accuracy; diagnostic test accuracy study; diagnostic value; diarrhea; Entamoeba histolytica; enzyme immunoassay; Escherichia coli; feces analysis; feces culture; gastroenteritis; Giardia intestinalis; gold standard; human; immunoaffinity chromatography; infant; infectious agent; intermethod comparison; major clinical study; meta analysis; microbiological examination; microorganism detection; microscopy; multiplex polymerase chain reaction; newborn; parasite; pretest posttest design; priority journal; quality control; real time polymerase chain reaction; receiver operating characteristic; retrospective study; Review; Rotavirus A; Salmonella; Sapovirus; sensitivity and specificity; serotyping; Shigella; systematic review; traveller diarrhea; Yersinia enterocoliticaAccuracy and comparison of two rapid multiplex PCR tests for gastroenteritis pathogens: a systematic review and meta-analysisreview10.1136/bmjgast-2020-000553336489832-s2.0-85102030280https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85102030280