駱尚廉臺灣大學：環境工程學研究所袁美華2007-11-292018-06-282007-11-292018-06-282004http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw//handle/246246/62706台灣目前推動生態工法，較多著重在河川治理、水土保持及道路工程，本研究對一般廢棄物衛生掩埋場的部分進行生態工法適用範疇的初探，並參考國內外資料提出一兼顧工程安全性與生態、人文特性的評估指數，包括物理次指數、污染防治次指數、生態次指數、環境教育次指數、遊憩功能次指數等五個次指數，有助於工程人員在規劃設計時之考慮方向及內容，並可使其立即回饋修改設計，以彌補非專業教育的不足，尤其在規劃設計時期，可利用本指標瞭解生態環境需要什麼、工程需要什麼，以及什麼樣的設計適合介入。 根據本研究所提出之評估指標，以福德坑掩埋場為案例分析對象，顯示福德坑掩埋場復育工作成效較佳的為安全性、污染防治兩部分，在生態、環境教育及遊憩功能方面則顯較弱，由於掩埋場復育工程一般係由工程師規劃、施工，依其專長作設計的結果，反而對於生態、環境或人文等考量不足，這也是生態與工程需要相互協調之處，以儘量減少生態學家與工程師在認知上的差異。With regard to ecological engineering in Taiwan, attentions so for are mainly paid to river management, siol conservation and road construction. This study was preliminarily investigated the application of ecological engineering on sanitary landfill domestic solid waste. Furthermore, based on international and domestic information, it was proposed various indicators with considerations of engineering safe, ecological, and cultural aspects. There are five main sub-indicators including physical, pollution prevention, ecology, environmental education sub-indicator, and outdoor activity function sub-indicator. These sub-indicators will be useful for engineers to design project, to obtain instant feedback, and to adjust. During the design stage, these indicators were facilitated to enhance, understanding of needs in terms of ecological environment, engineering, and proper design. Based on the results of investigation of FUDER landfill, these indicators were practically feasible and easily implemented. As for as the practical results were concerned, it was indicated that excellent accomplishments were achieved by both safety and pollution prevention. On the contrary, relatively poor results were found in relation to ecology, environmental education, and outdoor activity function due to the layout of FUDER landfill designed by general engineer with less ecological, environmental and cultural considerations. In terms of the conceptual differences, mutual consensus has to be reached by both engineer and ecologist.第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究緣起 1 1.2 研究對象及範疇 1 1.3 研究方法與流程 3 第二章 文獻回顧 5 2.1 國內外生態工法推動情形 5 2.1.1 生態工法的沿革 5 2.1.2 國內常見之生態工法 6 2.2 生態環境指數 9 2.2.1 溪流狀況指數 10 2.2.2 生物保全指數 21 2.3 國內外掩埋場復育情形 23 2.3.1 國內掩埋場復育評鑑 23 2.3.2 國內外掩埋場復育案例 25 2.4 小結 35 第三章 掩埋場復育狀況指數 37 3.1 掩埋場復育指標清單的建立 37 3.2 掩埋場狀況指數之組成 39 3.3 掩埋場狀況指數之評估 48 3.3.1 物理指數 48 3.3.2 污染防治指數 48 3.3.3 生態指數 50 3.3.4 環境教育指數 51 3.3.5 遊憩功能指數 52 3.4 達成方式分析 53 3.4.1 物理指數 53 3.4.2 污染防治指數 60 3.4.3 生態指數 64 3.4.4 環境教育指數 71 3.4.5 遊憩功能指數 75 3.5 實證分析 83 3.5.1 台北市福德坑掩埋場 83 3.5.2 台北市福德坑掩埋場復育狀況指數分析 86 第四章 結論與建議 99 4.1 結論 99 4.2 建議 100 參考文獻 103 附錄一 常見生態工法種類 106 附錄二 一般廢棄物掩埋場沼氣發電獎勵辦法 1112205052 bytesapplication/pdfen-US生態工法掩埋場指標indicatorlandfillecologial engineering[SDGs]SDG4[SDGs]SDG12thesishttp://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw/bitstream/246246/62706/1/ntu-93-P91541210-1.pdf