指導教授：郭斯傑臺灣大學：土木工程學研究所王冠文Wang, Kuan-WenKuan-WenWang2014-11-252018-07-092014-11-252018-07-092014http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw//handle/246246/260883工程採購主辦機關為編列預算方便，並未考量廠商提供勞務服務與工程性質、勞務服務工作內容之相對成本關係，大多以「建造費用百分比法」作為給付服務費之計算方式。實務上，因目前國內公共工程預算標比約為82.41%，造成廠商無實際利潤可言。加上國內工程主辦機關，於採購契約條文訂定上，多超出技服辦法規定，且技服辦法自民國88年頒布施行至今，專案管理服務費率從未調整，又國內公共工程工期延宕狀況屢見不鮮，各種因素，造成專案管理廠商之勞務成本支出，補償無門。由於以上國內機關辦理委託專案管理技術服務採購之契約履約範疇及計費方式問題，導致專案管理廠商面臨服務費與實際履約成本顯有落差，是值得深入探討問題。 本研究經統計近三年專案管理技術服務標案公告標案提出經常採購機關於制定專案管理契約服務工作時常見之不合理情形，另就機關採購多偏愛採用建造百分比法，衍生之額外服務無法計費問題，及技術服務費率合理調整應考量因素提出看法建議，依據設計監造與專案管理服務間之計費關聯性及藉由實際執行案例研究，提出採用建造費用百分比法計費調整費率及短期間之因應對策建議，對於專案管理技術服務計費公平性，期有所助益。The authority of engineering procurement for budgeting convenient does not consider the vendors providing labor services with engineering properties and the relative cost related labor services content. Mostly, as a " Percentage of Construction Cost Method" to the payment service fee calculation. In practice, because the current standard ratio of domestic public works budget is about 82.41%, that results manufacturers no real profit at all. The domestic engineering authorities always set contract provisions of procurement beyond the technical requirements. Since 1999 the Technical Service Regulation implemented so far, project management service fees never been adjusted. On the other hand, domestic public construction period delayed with uncommon condition and caused by a variety of factors, that resulted in labor costs overrun and project management manufacturers compensated nowhere. Because of these national authorities commissioned project management technology services procurement, which contract performance range and billing issues resulted project management service fees and actual compliance costs significantly there was a gap. Above all is worthy of further study. This research statistics the last three years project management technical service bulletins tenders propose unreasonable conditions when regular procurement agencies made service contracts. Then, this study reports recommendations two views, one is authorities more prefer applying the percentage of the construction method that additional services can not be derived from billing issues ,two is technical service rates should be considered a reasonable adjustment factor. According to the billing relationship with the design , supervision and project management services, as well as the case studies, this paper proposed the suggestions about adjustment expenses for using the "Percentage of Construction Costs Method" and the billing fairness for project management technology services.口試委員會審定書# 誌謝i 中文摘要ii ABSTRACT iii 圖目錄vii 表目錄viii 第一章緒論1 1.1研究動機1 1.2研究目的2 1.3研究對象與範圍2 1.4研究方法2 1.5研究流程3 第二章文獻回顧5 2.1機關委託技術服務廠商評選及計費辦法法令沿革5 2.2專案管理的服務範疇13 2.3國內專案管理之形式16 2.4國內專案管理服務計費方式20 2.5計費方式問題24 2.6小結27 第三章機關辦理專案管理採購契約履約範疇研究33 3.1近三年專案管理類招標案件33 3.2經常辦理採購機關分析38 3.3經常採購機關採購契約履約範疇不合理條文分析44 3.3.1不合理條文定義44 3.3.2採購契約履約範疇不合理條文分析44 3.4小結78 第四章專案管理採購服務計費問題84 4.1技術服務費修正演進84 4.2技術服務之關聯性86 4.3「專案管理」技術計費費率問題91 4.4小結93 第五章案例分析94 5.1案例基本資料94 5.2案例分析94 5.2.1案例一95 5.2.2案例二98 5.2.3案例三102 5.2.4案例四106 5.2.5案例五111 5.3綜合分析113 5.4小結117 第六章 結論與建議120 6.1結論120 6.2建議124 參考文獻126 附錄一128 附錄二135 附錄三142 附錄四148 附錄五1529161064 bytesapplication/pdf論文公開時間：2017/07/09論文使用權限：同意有償授權(權利金給回饋學校)建造費用百分比法專案管理經常採購機關thesishttp://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw/bitstream/246246/260883/1/ntu-103-P00521713-1.pdf