2004-08-012024-05-17https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/688708摘要：本計畫嘗試檢討史特勞斯批判現代性的哲學論述分析。史特勞斯的超越現代性方案：以政治哲學史為論述場域，從批判啟蒙理性著手，而向古典世界汲取思想資源。因而史特勞斯回歸柏拉圖，訴求一種不同於啟蒙時期所理解的理性，一種古典時代的理性，來作為超越現代性危機的療方。正如史特勞斯所言，現代性的危機正是政治哲學的危機，所以批判現代性的同時，則一道進行政治哲學的重建工作。相對地，尼采與海德格直接批判並拋棄現代性，但並不抱持任何懷舊思想，直接將眼光投向未來。本計畫將分成三部分來論述。首先，本計畫嘗試整理史特勞斯批判現代性所提出的哲學論證，並分析其意圖與思考之缺陷；其次，討論史特勞斯與尼采二者在思考現代性議題上的親近性及其差異，並說明史特勞斯對海德格思想的解讀有何重要意義；最後，綜合上述論點，探究史特勞斯與後現代主義是否有對話的空間？ <br> Abstract: This project tries to analyze the argument and significance in Strauss’ critique of modernity. For Strauss, modernity had destroyed the traditional order, and he had a great longing for a nostalgic return to the antiquity. On this point, the philosophy of Plato is the main resources of Strauss’ philosophical project. There are three topics to deals with in this project: firstly, what kind of arguments did Strauss pose for the critique of modernity? secondly, there seems a close affinity between Strauss and Nietzsche in thinking about the issue of modernity. To this, I will point out what it is, show the essential differences of these two philosophers, and tries to figure out the Strauss’ interpretation on Martin Heidegger; thirdly, to examine the possibility of conversation between Strauss and postmodern philosophers, such as Nietzsche and Heidegger.史特勞斯現代性後現代主義Leo Straussmodernity