社會科學院: 國家發展研究所指導教授: 林建甫; 唐代彪魏雨林Wei, Yu-LinYu-LinWei2017-03-032018-06-282017-03-032018-06-282016http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw//handle/246246/274566本文在旨在分析中國的「幸福﹣收入」問題，所採用度量中國居民幸福程度的指標主要是主觀幸福指數，同時和現有文獻不同的是，本文考慮對應的中國居民客觀幸福指數。 本文選擇兩個總體變數﹣地區經濟開放度與客觀幸福指數﹣進入到模型分析中。為了消除不僅是統計上更是經濟邏輯這兩個變數的共線性，本文用一節內容分析了兩者的共線性的原因以及迴歸結果，得出地區經濟開放度對客觀幸福指數有正向影響。在此基礎上，本文對主觀幸福指數與收入的關係進行分析。 首先，本文構建收入作為核心解釋變數，其他因素作為輔助解釋變數，主觀幸福作為被解釋變數的模型。模型說明收入對主觀幸福的影響分為三個階段。收入在比較低水平到第一臨界收入點時，對主觀幸福的影響主要通過對生存性需要產品的消費，此時收入對幸福的影響較明顯。當收入處於第一臨界收入點與第二收入臨界點之間時，收入對主觀幸福的影響主要通過對精神性需要的產品消費上。這個階段初期容易出現「幸福﹣收入」悖論，而且收入對主觀幸福的影響不明顯。收入達到第三個階段是一個理想的階段，類似自由王國的狀態。同樣，為了驗證模型的結論，并回答中國是否存在「幸福﹣收入」悖論的問題以及查看其他因素對主觀幸福的影響，本文採用描述性分析和迴歸模型兩種方法。描述性分析的結果是主觀幸福隨收入的增加先上升后下降，似乎支持中國存在「幸福﹣收入」悖論，按照其他因素對樣本劃分后結果也是如此。但迴歸模型結果表明，收入的迴歸係數顯著為正，收入平方的迴歸係數顯著為負。這個結論解釋了為什麼從統計上會出現中國「幸福﹣收入」悖論，原因在於忽略了很多相關變數。通過觀察其他變數對幸福的影響，我們認為之所以描述性分析表現出「幸福﹣收入」悖論的現象是因為其他因素對幸福的抑制作用抵消并超過收入對幸福的提升作用。收入增加幸福下降目前對中國而言是假性「幸福﹣收入」悖論。收入對幸福仍然有提升作用，只是不明顯罷了。最後，我們分析微觀因素和宏觀因素對幸福的影響，認為政治背景、婚姻狀態、性別、信仰狀況、社會公平認知、社會信任認知等因素對幸福有明顯的正向作用，民族類型對幸福有明顯的負向作用，客觀幸福指數對主觀幸福有顯著的正向提升作用。This paper aims to analyze Chinese ""happiness-income"" problem, the measurement of the Chinese residents'' happiness index adopted is primarily subjective well-being index. Unlike the existing literatures, this paper includes the objective happiness index. This paper chooses two macroeconomic variables-regional economic openness and objective happiness-into the model. In order to eliminate the collinearity of the two variables not only in economic logic but also in statistics, using one section, this paper analyzes the reason of collinearity and regression results, concluding that regional economic openness has a positive effect on the objective happiness index. On this basis, this paper analyzes the relationship between the subjective well-being and income. First, this paper builds a model which involves income as the core variable, other factors as the auxiliary variable and subjective well-being as explained variable. This model illustrates that the impact of income on subjective well-being is divided into three stages. When income is in the level from a lower level to the first critical income, its influence on subjective well-being is mainly through the survivability need products consumption, and at this level the effect of income on happiness is obvious. When income is in the level from the first critical point to the second critical income, its effect on subjective well-being is mainly through the spiritual need of product consumption. At the start of this stage, it is prone to have ""happiness - income"" paradox, and the impact of income on subjective well-being is not obvious. The third stage is ideal, which is similar to the state of the kingdom of freedom. In order to validate the conclusion of the model, and answer the existence of ""happiness -income"" paradox and view other factors influence on subjective well-being, this paper uses the descriptive analysis and the regression model. The result of descriptive analysis is that the subjective well-being increases with income and then declines, which seems to support the existence of Chinese ""happiness- income"" paradox. The results are the same when dividing the sample according to other factors. But regression model shows that the regression coefficient of income is significantly positive and the regression coefficient of income square is significantly negative. The conclusion explains from statistics the reason of emergence of Chinese ""happiness-income"" paradox, that is the ignorance of a lot of related variables. By observing the effects of other variables on happiness, we think that the effects of other factors on happiness offset the effect of income on happiness, which can be explained the reason of the phenomenon of ""happiness-income""paradox.That income increases while happiness drops is a pseudo ""happiness-income"" paradox. Income still promotes happiness. Finally, we analyze the influence of the micro and macro factors on happiness, concluding that the political background, marital status, gender, belief, social trust, social justice have obvious positive effect on happiness, meanwhile national type has a significant negative effect on happiness, and objective happiness index has significant positive promotion effect on subjective well-being.論文使用權限: 不同意授權客觀幸福指數主觀幸福指數「幸福﹣收入」悖論有序概率選擇模型中國經濟地區差異性objective happinesssubjective well-beingthesis10.6342/NTU201600678