2015-01-012024-05-15https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/666020摘要：近年來，政治學界關於比較威權主義的研究取得了許多突破性的進展。在最近的研究中，許多學者將焦點置於威權體制內部具有民主形式的機構，包括政黨、立法機構、與半競爭性選舉等，探究威權體制設立這些機制的原因，以及這些機制是否有助於威權政體的穩定與持續。在中國大陸的情況中，其政府目前正積極地嘗試引進多項機制以改革其立法體制，其中最重要的就是讓社會意見進入立法過程。許多新的參與管道因而建立，包括召開聽證會或座談會，以及公開法律草案以徵求社會意見等。本計畫聚焦於開門立法，探討其出現的原因與施行情況，在實際研究進程中，筆者將依據開門立法出現的三項可能原因，即社會力量的施壓、資訊蒐集的需要、與對抗部門立法的習慣，依次討論相關目標的執行效果。<br> Abstract: In the past decades, the Chinese government has introduced varieties of channels for public participation in its legislative process. These include public hearings, workshops, and publishing draft laws to solicit feedback from its citizens. Why did the Chinese government open up its legislation? Several reasons have been identified by China observers. On the one hand, mass-line law-making could counterweight the notorious tradition of departmentalism. On the other hand, this new practice helped the Chinese government to collect more information about the society. Through an examination of China`s introduction of the “open-door legislation”, this project discusses whether the open-door legislation has contributed to China’s quality of governance.威權政體開門立法部門立法治理品質AuthoritarianismOpen-door LegislationDepartmentalismQuality of Governance