2012-08-012024-05-17https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/690660摘要：西塞羅《論善與惡的界限》成書於45 BC，全書由三個對話錄組成，分別陳述及批判三個哲學學派的倫理學理論，伊比鳩魯學派 (卷一與二)、斯多葛學派 (卷三及四) 及代表「老學院」(the Old Academy) 的安提歐庫斯 (Antiochus of Ascalon) (卷四及五)。本書在哲學史或西洋古代倫理學的研究上有五個重要性：第一、可讓後世研究者了解這三個學派的倫理學思想的基本系統與結構為何，且藉由書中對它們的批判，亦可見三個理論各自的缺點為何；第二、書中關於伊比鳩魯學派的批判試中肯合理，抑或是語帶偏見？值得我們思考探究；第三、書中關於斯多葛學派倫理學思想的細節論述，是我們理解該學派思想的重要文獻；第四、後世對安提歐庫斯的 (倫理學) 思想的建構，本書有不可取代的地位；第五、西塞羅在書中所採取的論述方式，凸顯「新學院」懷疑主義的論證的特質，對一觀點進行正反兩面的論述，但不為此觀點背書。 本書尚無中文譯注本。 <br> Abstract: Cicero’s De Finibus de Bonorum et Malorum which consisted of five books was completed in 45 BC. The whole work expounds and criticises respectively the thoughts of the three philosophical schools in the Hellenistic age, i.e. the Epicureanism (books 1 and 2), the Stoicism (books 3 and 4), and Antiochus of Ascalon of the old Academy (book 4 and 5). The importance of this book in the history of western ancient philosophy is five-fold: Firstly, by virtue of this book the structures and characteristics of the thoughts of the three schools can be seen in the modern eyes. Moreover the criticisms of them in the book can also show their shortcomings in ethical reasoning ; Secondly, Cicero’s vehement criticism of Epicurus and his school is sound and reasonable, or based upon his personal prejudices, which is a problem worth our attention. Thirdly, the detailed discussion of the Stoicism in this book provides us with a clear understanding of the Stoic ethical thought. Fourthly, De Fininus provides the essential information for the reconstruction of the Antiochean syncretism in ethical thought. Finally, Cicero’s criticisms of all three schools illustrate the practices of the skepticism of the New Academy in the Roman Republic. There is no annotated version of De Finibus in Chinese.西塞羅至善伊比鳩魯學派快樂斯多葛學派德性自然逍遙學派柏拉圖老學院新學院懷疑主義安提歐庫斯CiceroFinal EndThe EpicureanismPleasureThe StoicismVirtueNatureThe PeripateticsPlato’s AcademyThe Scepticism of the New AcademyAntiochus of Ascalon