2018-06-252024-05-18https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/700942摘要:商品自傷之法律關係應如何解決,為學說與實務之重大議題,甚具研究價值。再者,德國與臺灣之契約與侵權責任法,在經過多年來學說與實務見解之發展後,兩者之適用範圍已經相當程度地被擴大,惟兩者責任之規範卻有諸多不同之處,因此應如何解決契約與侵權責任因交錯適用所生之問題,亦有加以研究之必要。本研究計畫係以「比較法學」之研究方法進行研究。詳言之,係在「考察德國法學說與實務見解之解釋」,參考「德國債法現代化之修法經驗」後,先就「德國法提出評釋」,並再借鏡於前揭三者所得結論,進而從「解釋論」與「立法論」兩者角度,「反思臺灣法就該項問題應如何予以處理」。第一年進度係以「契約與侵權責任孰者對於被害人之保護較優」為客體,並著重於:1、買受人就物之自始瑕疵所致損害有無損害賠償請求權?2、買受人之契約或侵權責任之損害賠償請求權,其時效相關問題;第二年度則續行研究商品自傷之法律關係。內容包括:1、契約責任之解決途徑;2、侵權責任之解決途徑;3、解決方案之提出。第三年度則處理契約與侵權責任之關係,亦即:1、契約與侵權責任適用範圍之擴大;2、契約與侵權責任因交錯適用所生問題之解決途徑。<br> Abstract: How to solve the case of “Product Injures Itself” is a big issue not only in Germany but also in Taiwan. After decades of development in Germany and Taiwan, both contractual and delictual liability is widely extended. Therefore, how to clear up the relationship between contractual and delictual liability is essential and worth researching. In this regards, this project will base on the comparative law. After reviewing the explanation of the German Law from literature and practice, the study will go on to compare the German practice of law, to put forward comment on German Law and to summarize how the Taiwanese Law should handle this issue at the end.商品自傷契約責任侵權責任比較法Product Injures Itselfcontractual liabilitydelictual liabilitycomparative law新進教師學術研究計畫/法律學院法律系/從商品自傷論契約與侵權責任之關係