國立臺灣大學哲學系暨研究所陳榮華2006-07-252018-05-292006-07-252018-05-292003-07-31http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw//handle/246246/14210無論海德格和高達美，都同樣強調提問(Fragen)在思考中的重要 性，然而，深入的分析可以看出，他們的提問概念在內容上有顯著的 差異。因此本文認為，我們可以從分析他們的提問概念，以說明他們 的思考概念。但本文的分析不是要指出他們的思考概念之差異，而是 要證成：相對於高達美，海德格的思考概念在理論上出現嚴重的困 難，使之難以成立。Both Heidegger and Gadamer emphasize the importance of “questioning” in the process of thinking. Therefore what thinking is can be revealed in the analysis of “questioning.” However regarding “questioning,” profound differences are shown in the philosophy of Heidegger and Gadamer. By analyzing the differences in their concepts of “questioning,” the differences between their concepts of thinking can also be revealed. Based on this analysis, we can attain the conclusion that regarding the concept of thinking, Heidegger’s theory cannot be justified; on the contrary, Gadamer’s theory is well founded.application/pdf257720 bytesapplication/pdfzh-TW國立臺灣大學哲學系暨研究所提問思考海德格高達美QuestionthinkingHeideggerGadamerreporthttp://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw/bitstream/246246/14210/1/912411H002014.pdf