2008-08-012024-05-17https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/672431摘要：本計畫是本人一系列相關研究的持續延伸，其核心的研究對象或主題脈絡有二，第一，由法概念論的「法律是什麼？」的問題意識，發展為什麼是法的規範性。第二，法規範性問題在臺灣/東亞的具體歷史經驗脈絡下的意義是什麼，我們可以由此等理論研究，反省看出這些經驗的何種新意涵。其中尤其關涉到法治、民主，與法學的客觀性等議題。但是由於這兩個問題層面都過於複雜龐大，因此實際著手研究的時候，也只能從比較瑣細的問題謹慎地展開探討。 本計畫預定第一年更精密地發展本人多年來持續探索的規範縫隙概念。此一概念與法規範性的關連需要更多的研究，其中尤其涉及法學研究與司法裁判所處理的對象問題。第二年將接續處理法規範性與合法性的關係，其中關鍵在於正當性統治如何透過合法性，來創造法規範性。第三年則希望運用前述理論，重新反省臺灣/東亞的「法治」經驗。本人的初步想法是，這是一個透過目的合智謀性(purpose-rationality)，來塑造正當性，並將其轉化為技術規範性(technical normativity)的過程。因此不但法治的價值理性或合理性會被公開地質疑，並且在實踐中浮現了一種以行政權為核心的宏觀特別權力關係傾向。而東亞的法治轉型，也不是一般所謂從「傳統法」朝向「西方法」的發展，而是帶有往「法策略」發展的趨力。 <br> Abstract: I will continue my research and theoretical concerns in the past few years in this project. Broadly speaking, there are two major concerns in my recent researches, first, reformulating the question ‘what is law?’ to ‘what establishes the legal normativity?’; second, based on such theorization of legal normativity, what sorts of new insights can be developed from the legal experiences of Taiwan and East Asia, particularly related to the problems of rule of law, democracy and the objectivity of legal knowledge? Due to the high complexity of these two dimensions, anyhow, I can only start with some trivial problems. In the first year of this project I will continue my investigation into the concept of normative gap. The problem of ‘objects’ of legal knowledge and judicial decisions plays the major role. The relation between legal normativity and legality will be studied in the second year. Particularly the way how the legitimate domination can create legal normativity through legality should be analyzed. In the third year I will try to use the theoretical results to reflect the rule of law experience of Taiwan and East Asia. My preliminary thoughts would be: this is a process of using purpose-rationality to create legitimacy and then transform it into technical normativity. Therefore, not only the value-rationality or reasonableness inherent in the idea of rule of law would be dismissed publicly, there also emerged in the practice a kind of macro special power relationship. I will argue that the transformation of East Asian rule of law is better understood as from traditional law to ‘strategic law’ than to alleged Western rule of law.規範性合法性規範縫隙規範存有實踐描述正當性（或正當合法）normativitylegalitynormative gapnormative beingpractical descriptionlegitimacy