指導教授：張重昭臺灣大學：商學研究所簡雅嵐Chien, Ya-LanYa-LanChien2014-11-282018-06-292014-11-282018-06-292013http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw//handle/246246/262811有些產品具有典型的產品使用情境，因此該產品在顧客有特定需求時容易被喚起，進而選擇使用。然而，具有典型使用情境的產品往往受限於特定的使用情境，而不利於其在市場上之擴展。有鑑於此，本研究的主要目的探討，具有使用情境典型性的產品如何延伸其使用性，尤其是具有何種特質的消費者能夠接受非典型性的使用情境之產品。 根據調節焦點與基模一致性理論，研究提出個體對產品使用情境的評估會依典型程度的不同而有所差異。其中促進焦點相較於預防焦點的消費者，重視可能獲得的利益以及所帶來的新穎性，對於可能造成的損失或不確定性較不在意，因此對於中度非典型使用情境的產品評價較佳；而對不同程度典型性產品使用情境的評價呈現倒U型。然而預防焦點的消費者，抗拒改變、傾向於維持現狀，因此對不一致產品的評估會隨者典型性減少而降低。本研究將採用兩項實驗設計以驗證假設。本研究之結果將有助於拓展典型性產品的使用情境，以達提升產品使用率、增加產品銷售量以及公司獲利力之效果。Products like champagne are strongly associated with typical benefits or certain usage contexts. This usage typicality easily reminds people of the product on specific occasions, but may limit product versatility and growth potential in the marketplace. This research aims to explore the possibility that a product with typical usages can extend its usability to atypical usage occasions. By drawing from the theory of self-regulatory focus and schema congruity theory, it is posited that people’s evaluations toward usage context vary by the degree of atypicality of use occasions. Compared with a preventional person, the promotional one’s evaluations of the usage contexts become more favorable because he or she sees greater gains from novelty benefits and fewer losses to risks or uncertainty associated with the moderate increase of atypicality. The relationship between consumers’ evaluations and level of typicality may present an inverted-U shape. For preventional people, their evaluations decrease monotonically as the atypicality increases, which is in accordance with the traditional notion that people generally resist changes that imply more risks and uncertainty. The proposed hypotheses are supported by results from two experiments on product use occasions and complementary products. Our findings may offer directions for marketers to expand their product typical usage context and the expansion of typical product usage context would help sale volume, and give rise to higher profitability.致謝 I 中文摘要 III Abstract IV Tables VIII Figures IX 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 THEORETICAL BACKGROUND 5 2.1 Typicality of Product Usage Context 5 2.1.1 Product Use Occasions 5 2.1.2 Complementary Products Use Occasions 6 2.2 Schema Congruity Theory 7 2.2.1 Schema 7 2.2.2 Schema Incongruity 8 2.2.3 Discrepancy Hypothesis 9 2.2.4 Moderate Incongruity Effect 10 2.3 Goal-Orientation 11 2.3.1 Self-regulatory Focus Systems 11 2.3.2 Self-regulatory Focus and Typicality 13 3 HYPOTHESES 14 4 METHODOLOGY 16 4.1 Study1 16 4.1.1 Pretest 16 4.1.2 Design, and Procedures 18 4.1.3 Measures 19 4.1.4 Results 21 4.1.5 Discussion 25 4.1 Study2 26 4.2.1 Design, and Procedures 26 4.2.2 Measures 27 4.2.3 Results 28 5 CONCLUSIONS 33 5.1 General Discussion 33 5.2 Theoretical Implications 34 5.3 Managerial Implications 36 5.4 Limitations and Future Research 37 REFERENCE 39 APPENDIX 491216902 bytesapplication/pdf論文使用權限：不同意授權自我調節焦點典型性產品使用情境基模一致性thesishttp://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw/bitstream/246246/262811/1/ntu-102-D97741006-1.pdf