2008-01-012024-05-17https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/678163摘要：在二十一世紀開端，古典文學研究的重點顯然是整合與跨界，因為角度多元，就必須進行「文學」內外跨界的理解，而跨越界線之後，才有更豐富具體的傳統與當代的整合。於是，如何選定一個在該領域已經累積有重要的成果的主題，同時是具有未來與其他領域整合並持續發展的潛力，更重要的是具有引領國內外相關領域彼此交流互動的前瞻性，就成為構思這個研究計畫的目的。 在這個理想上，中文系相關於文學研究的同仁們，擬定了這個研究題目，「文學典範的建立與轉化」，這可以說是在重寫文學史或文學批評史的潮流中，進行更後設性的反省，也照顧到解構主義盛行以來，如何由文本到文本環境乃至於話語權力等等的觀點轉移。在這樣的脈絡底下，文學史的重寫因此不再僅僅針對所謂「文學典範」本身的標舉陳列，「如何形成」文學典範，反而成為重點。於是,對於真實與虛構間的糾結，權力論述的生成，文學體式與象徵體系的對應，「文學準則」與「權力準則」的拉鋸，個人(私密)與集體(公共)的對話等議題，都將進行深入的討論. 本計劃希望先由本系同仁透過密集研討而形成相互理解且整合成共識，進一步在共識上推促可能結合海內外多元領域的更大成果，而將台灣「在地」的古典文學研究推向另一個全球視野的新境界。 <br> Abstract: At the start of the 21st century, the focus of research on classical literature was clearly on integration and going beyond traditional scopes and fields. Because perspectives are becoming more diversified, an understanding of literature that is both interdisciplinary and international is needed. Only when we have traversed beyond traditional scopes of research can a fuller, more concrete tradition be integrated with the present age. Therefore, the purpose behind this research project is to select a topic that has the potential to merge with other disciplines and to have continued advances in this field that has already made many important achievements—and even more importantly, the topic must be of such a nature so as to lead to interaction and exchange between related fields both here and abroad. With this ideal in mind, colleagues in the Department of Chinese Literature at NTU who research literature have formulated the following research topic: “The Creation and Transformation of Literary Paradigms.” This is, in the new trend of rewriting the history of literature and the history of literary criticism, a topic that lends itself to even more of a meta-analytical approach. It also has the potential to account for such perspective shifts as moving analysis beyond the text to the environment and circumstances surrounding the text, the authoritative nature of words, etc. that have come in the wake of the deconstruction movement. In this context, the rewriting of literary history is no longer merely an act of delineating “literature paradigms” as they are sometimes termed; rather, the focus is now on “How are these paradigms formed?” Therefore, more in depth discussion will be conducted regarding such issues as the mixing of reality and fiction, the growth of authoritative discourse, the correspondence between literary forms and symbolic systems, the tug-of-war between “literary norms” and “authoritative norms,” and the dialogue between personal (private) and collective (public). This project aims to first have professors in the department arrive at a consensus and mutual understand through active discussion. Then, on the basis of this consensus, we will attempt to push our understanding further by integrating research from various fields, both here and abroad. This will enable Taiwan’s “local” research on classical literature to move to a new level, one with a global outlook.