2017-08-012024-05-17https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/681882摘要：近年來，為了因應層出不窮的政治經濟社會問題，臺灣社會習慣接受以刑事立法方式作為解決手段，不但在處罰力道上朝向嚴罰化、重刑化，在處罰範圍上也擴散到日常生活中的各個領域。不僅是臺灣社會，在歐美或者日本也都有類似「刑罰積極主義」的趨勢。過去以來，作為規範學科的刑法理論多半將重點置放在現行法律的解釋與適用，亦即，著重在法釋義學，而忽視立法學的重要性。然而，近年來，國外的相關法學家開始關注立法學的意義，包括有從釋憲方法論演繹出的「憲法的刑事立法學」或從法益論及利益衡量流程建構而得的「犯罪化論」，乃至於自法哲學理論開展的「立法哲學（legisprudence）」，皆有參考之價值。本研究之目的即在於探求符合當代社會需求之「刑事立法學」，並且應用在當前迫切面臨立法正當性檢驗的刑事法領域中。 <br> Abstract: In recent years, in order to cope with various kinds of political, economic and social problems in Taiwan, we broudly accept criminal legislation as a means of settlement in two ways, one is to make punishment more severe, and the other is to regard criminal punishment as a “prima ratio” rather than “ultima ratio”. Not only in Taiwan but also in Europe and the United States or in Japan, this kind of trend,which could be called as "criminal activism" is also common. In the past, legal theories of criminal law mostly focused on legal interpretation and application of statutes, while failing to take criminal legisration seriously. However, in recent years, we began to pay attention to what the criminal legislation should be. This project ask simple questions: can we deploy those tools dealing with judicial interpretation and application into the legislative law-making process? How can “theory of criminal legislation” be possible? In order to answer these questions, this project will figure out the roles of constitution throughout the process of legislation with using theory of “legisprudence”.最後手段性立法哲學犯罪化ultima ratiolegisprudencecriminalization