2012-08-012024-05-17https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/671056摘要：作為一種政治策略，列寧主義將社會權力集中於「戰鬥性的黨」，由訓練有素、紀律嚴 明的幹部來領導、組織與動員人民。既有的研究文獻未能解答(1)列寧主義作為一種革 命策略與作一種統治策略，有什麼樣的形態差異？(2)兩種列寧主義又分別依循那一種 的動員結構，招募到不同的參與成員？ 本研究企圖從台灣戰後初期的勞工史，來解答上述兩個問題。在1947 年二二八事件 中，許多工人所組織的自衛隊被軍隊鎮壓，此一悲劇性結果提供了中國共產黨台灣省 工作委員會滲透工廠的機會。一直到1953 年被白色恐怖殲滅之前，革命性的列寧主義 吸收不少的工人，也在許多重要的工廠建立了其地下組織。從1950 年起，國民黨也發 起改造運動，積極吸收生產者黨員，一方面應因共產黨的威脅，另一方面強化對於台 灣控制。幾乎在同一個時期，台灣勞工面臨了兩種形態迥異的列寧主義之競爭，也因 此提供了歷史比較研究的題材。 本研究將採取Charles Ragin 所開發的質性比較分析(qualitative comparative analysis)，釐清兩種列寧主義的組織化形態。申請者將要收集、整理、登錄既有的公 文檔案、回憶錄、口述歷史等資料，以整理(1)二二八事件中的勞工動員、(2)地下黨運 動、(3)國民黨的改造運動，三者之間的相互關係。<br> Abstract: As a political strategy, Leninism essentially aims to concentrate social powers in a combat party of trained and disciplined cadres, who lead, organize and mobilize people. Existing literature fails to answer (1) the morphological difference between revolutionary Leninism and Leninism-in-power and (2) the different mobilizing structure that two Leninisms use as well as their diversified constituencies. This research seeks to answer these two questions with Taiwan’s early postwar labor history. In the February 28 Incident of 1947, workers’self-defense militias were suppressed by the military. This tragic consequence provided the opportunity for the Chinese Communist Party’s Taiwan Province Work Committee to infiltrate factories. Prior to its annihilation in the White Terror in 1953, revolutionary Leninism recruited many worker members and established clandestine organizations in many workplaces. On the other hand, since 1950, the KMT launched its re-organization movement by recruiting mass membership among industrial producers as a means to counter the communist threat as well as to consolidate its grip on Taiwan. Hence, almost within the same time frame, Taiwan’s labor faced the competition between two Leninisms—a valuable material for historical comparative study. This research adopts the qualitative comparative analysis developed by Charles Ragin to understand the organizing methods by two Leninisms. I will collect, analyze, and code the official documents, memoirs and oral histories in order to clarify the relationship among (1) working class mobilization during the February 28 Incident, (2) the communist clandestine movement, and (3) the KMT’s re-organization.