HSUN-YI FUYI-CHIA WANGTsao, Chuan I.Chuan I.TsaoYu, Sz-HanSz-HanYuYIH-SHARNG CHENHENG-WEN CHOUNAI-HSIN CHICHIH-HSIEN WANGRON-BIN HSUSHU-CHIEN HUANGHSI-YU YUNAI-KUAN CHOU2021-12-022021-12-022021-07-300929-6646https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/589479Background/purpose: Sensitization, the presence of preformed anti-human antibody in recipients, restricts access to ABO-compatible donors in heart transplant. Desensitization therapy works by reducing preformed antibodies to increase the chances of a negative crossmatch or permit safe transplantation across positive crossmatch. There is no consensus regarding the desensitization protocol in cardiac patients, and the outcome of desensitization remains under debate. Methods: Twenty-five consecutive sensitized heart transplant recipients received perioperative desensitization in our institution from 2012 to 2019. One-year patient survival and graft rejection rate were analyzed and compared between sensitized recipients and non-sensitized recipients. Results: Within the first year after transplant, patient survival in sensitized recipients was 76%. Infection was the major cause of death. The cumulative incidence of rejection was 8% for antibody-mediated rejection and 16% for acute cellular rejection. No significant difference in 1-year survival or rejection rate could be demonstrated between sensitized and nonsensitized recipients. Conclusion: Acceptable early outcomes in patient survival and graft rejection could be anticipated in sensitized heart transplant recipients under a perioperative algorithm using complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch- or panel-reactive antibody-directed urgent immunomodulation strategies, while infection remains the major concern.enDesensitizationHeart transplantSensitization[SDGs]SDG3journal article10.1016/j.jfma.2021.07.014343408912-s2.0-85111568184https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/577805