2013-08-012024-05-18https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/702224摘要：本申請案為配合台灣大學邁向頂尖大學計畫第5 年經費支嚴重短並即將結 束，該計畫目前已經推動四年，即將進入第五年。計畫旨在建立有世界特 色的中國學研究議程。目前世界上流通的中國研究，不存在英語文獻外的 問題意識，近年已引起個別學者的反思與批評，但是缺乏深入的發掘、有 系統的研究與全面的整理。本計畫主要以後共產主義社會為範圍，整理流 行於英語文獻之外的中國學問題意識，向後追溯，向前開展，整理非英語 文獻之中國知識史，勢必對當前世界中國學的研究議程形成重大撞擊。 在方法上，本計畫通過各國研究團隊的加入，一方面對各國資深中國 學者進行口述歷史訪談，組織各國研究者對此訪談結果進行分析；二方面 並動員國內研究生整理各國中國學既有文獻中之問題意識，以此作為論文 課題，開展源源不絕的個人知識史、議題知識史與社群知識史，形成與英 語文獻相互對照的一個多元、多層次的中國學樣貌；三方面以研究帶動教 學，以教學支援發表，以發表完成研究，形成研究、教學與發表三合一的 學術環境。<br> Abstract: This proposal is for the 5th year of a very long term project sponsored by the NTU Top University Project. The project provides an epistemological review of how past social science and historiography research on China in general and Chinese politics in particular has affected the way post-socialist/communist scholars approach identity politics in global affairs. These post-communist scholars come from Mongolia, Russia, Czech, and Slovakia. An epistemological review of this sort enables the research community to locate the past research in non-English each in its historical context. When this is done, the local scholarship can legitimately develop theoretical perspectives embedded in indigenous discourse. This current project begins with the assumption that China research and the image of China are mutually constituted. Political, social and economic relations between China and other communities affect the research of China in those communities. This project collects data of these complicated relations and reviews the evolution of the China agenda in each different community, which refers to the evolution of methodology, subject matter, curriculum, student enrollment as well as research funding. There are five sub-projects dealing with the oral history of senior China scholars concerning their career path, the sources of funding, the change and continuity in research agenda, the change and continuity in curriculum and the approach to managing cross-national research. To execute this project, the project director will call for interviewees from each local community that meet with the goal of the project and, accordingly, this project will eventually serve as a global platform for each research community to exchange their self-critical reviews.